Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(53,356 posts)
34. In 2011 they made $419 billion in sales
Fri May 31, 2013, 01:01 AM
May 2013

$25 billion in profit on $419 billion in sales is...oh, 5.9 percent.

Now let's play with Business Insider's numbers. And to do this, try a fun site I found: livingwage.mit.edu which will show you the living wage in any area of the country. I used one adult with one child for my family size and found that the "average" living wage in the US for that kind of family is about $18.50 per hour.

A lot of Walmart's jobs are minimum wage, but let's say our hypothetical Walmart associate pulls down $10 per hour. Giving each of their employees a $5000/year raise would amount to an hourly increase of $2.40 per hour, or less than $12.50 total pay. (On a weekly basis it's $96.) Subtract $12.50 from the $18.50 "living wage" and you're six bucks an hour shy. And as Samuel L. Jackson might say, "I don't care how you cut it, that's a whole lot shy."

Let's go at it from another direction: To give a $10 per hour employee enough of a raise that they make a living wage would cost $17,680 per year per employee. To give 1.4 million people enough of a raise to make them all living wage employees would cost $24.75 billion - almost their entire 2010 profit! (In actuality, some Walmart associates do earn a living wage, a lot of them don't even make close to $10 per hour, the number that constitutes a living wage varies depending on your family composition and where you live, and there are more employees now so these numbers aren't accurate, but they give a decent picture of the problem.)

When you have this much of a disparity between what is and what should be, diverting a little bit of profit, lowering the CEO's salary ($10 per US employee) or other band-aid measures simply will not fix the problem. They are going to have to take in more money without increasing their expenses, and distribute the surplus cash to their employees. The only possible way to do this is to raise prices. Increasing sales is a double-edged sword: more money comes in, but more also goes out because, mirabile dictu, you've gotta buy the additional product before you can sell it to people, you've got to dispatch more trucks to haul it to the stores, you've got to have more stores to sell it out of and more people to work in them, which means your profit margin doesn't actually change.

The real answer is to get some actual industry in this country so no one ever has to say "I work retail because it's the only job in town." But that's an issue for another time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Needs to lower the salary of it's CVD levels uponit7771 May 2013 #1
It wouldn't help jmowreader May 2013 #24
Great stories, but . . . aggiesal May 2013 #26
Thank you for showing the greed of the Walmart heirs brush May 2013 #28
You seriously do not understand the problem jmowreader May 2013 #31
I don't understand the problem? aggiesal May 2013 #33
In 2011 they made $419 billion in sales jmowreader May 2013 #34
OK, so let's go in a little deeper with those numbers. aggiesal May 2013 #44
Oh bull, how much do the Walton family take? There's plenty there for employee benefits. xtraxritical May 2013 #40
Want to know how to find out exactly how and what the CEO compensation is? (edited) A HERETIC I AM May 2013 #46
B-B-B-But you can sleep in your van in their parking lots!!! cliffordu May 2013 #2
With their wage rate, where else are you going to sleep? DotGone May 2013 #13
Jesus. Bet them laws don't apply cliffordu May 2013 #18
They run an ad xxqqqzme May 2013 #3
Yes, it would. And it's $2 billion over 5 years. Their sales are over 200 billion a year. Incitatus May 2013 #5
There's not much difference between the two jmowreader May 2013 #25
over 5 years? xxqqqzme May 2013 #35
Yes, and it's not exactly all coming from their profits. Incitatus May 2013 #36
They will manipulate the "cost" of their donations to create a larger write off xtraxritical May 2013 #41
I have walked into their stores twice in the US. I haven't bothered here in Canada. PDJane May 2013 #4
And the biggest beneficiaries probably sleep all day. moondust May 2013 #6
One is a drunk driver n2doc May 2013 #7
Well, maybe he couldn't afford a cab. Or a chauffer. denverbill May 2013 #20
It's not her first DUI n2doc May 2013 #23
Wont. Not cant. nt bunnies May 2013 #8
Come and tell the shareholders. Will meet on June 7, Bud Walton Arena, sinkingfeeling May 2013 #9
Is Elton on some kind of "Megarich Repuke Tour"? KamaAina May 2013 #10
Cut Elton John some slack - he's got 2 kids, 2 households and a husband to support! TheDebbieDee May 2013 #11
Never will shop there. I like Costco and the way they Rex May 2013 #12
Wal-Mart is a heinous organization. lark May 2013 #14
I saw a Walmart Ad that made me want to put my fist through my TV the other day. Initech May 2013 #15
2013 Billionaires Richest Women--Christy and Alice Walton antigop May 2013 #16
What's up with the brown fitted hat at the top? Jamaal510 May 2013 #17
It's an internet meme. Tafiti May 2013 #21
I haven't been inside one in years. SheilaT May 2013 #19
You have choices. Manifestor_of_Light May 2013 #22
THANK you for pointing that out! jmowreader May 2013 #27
Good point about Costco. Manifestor_of_Light May 2013 #29
Aldi is another mystery to me jmowreader May 2013 #30
Veal is cruelty. roody May 2013 #32
costco didn't make it easier for washington teens to get liquor, the stupid voters did. HiPointDem May 2013 #38
Costco wrote the initiative and poured buckets of money into the campaign jmowreader Jun 2013 #47
Costco *wrote* the initiative? gotta link? HiPointDem Jun 2013 #48
Yup... jmowreader Jun 2013 #50
+1. also has millions to fund every anti-union, anti-public-employees, anti-public-school HiPointDem May 2013 #37
I hate going in there, my wife loves them rl6214 May 2013 #39
They have a pretty shrewd business model... KansDem May 2013 #42
yes, they get a charitable deduction if it's the corporation doing the giving. if it's the walmart HiPointDem Jun 2013 #49
. blkmusclmachine May 2013 #43
Interesting statistic from Thom Hartmann yesterday. Cleita May 2013 #45
I fuking hate walmart! youd have to drag my dead body in there darkangel218 Jun 2013 #51
No argument here. k&r n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I my opinion this is one ...»Reply #34