Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
13. National Security Agency Whistleblower William Binney on Growing State Surveillance
Fri May 31, 2013, 12:08 PM
May 2013

Democracy Now interviewed Binney last year:



EXCERPT...

WILLIAM BINNEY: Well, and, you see, the World Wide Web routes things all over, so you never really know where U.S. citizens’ communications are going to be routed. So, you—if you were collecting somewhere else on another continent, you could still get U.S. citizens. That’s—see, that was a universal problem. So we devised how to do that and protect U.S. citizens. So—and this was all before 9/11. And we devised how to do that, made that effective and operating. So we were actually prepared to deploy about eight months before 9/11 and actually have a system that would run and manage the—what I call 20 terabytes a minute of activity.

So—but after 9/11, all the wraps came off for NSA, and they decided to—between the White House and NSA and CIA, they decided to eliminate the protections on U.S. citizens and collect on domestically. So they started collecting from a commercial—the one commercial company that I know of that participated provided over 300—probably, on the average, about 320 million records of communication of a U.S. citizen to a U.S. citizen inside this country.

AMY GOODMAN: What company?

WILLIAM BINNEY: AT&T. It was long-distance communications. So they were providing billing data. At that point, I knew I could not stay, because it was a direct violation of the constitutional rights of everybody in the country. Plus it violated the pen register law and Stored Communications Act, the Electronic Privacy Act, the intelligence acts of 1947 and 1978. I mean, it was just this whole series of—plus all the laws covering federal communications governing telecoms. I mean, all those laws were being violated, including the Constitution. And that was a decision made that wasn’t going to be reversed, so I could not stay there. I had to leave.

CONTINUED w/video, transcript, etc...

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/4/20/exclusive_national_security_agency_whistleblower_william



Thanks for the heads-up, leveymg! A thin thread ties us all...
K&R MotherPetrie May 2013 #1
It's not Democracy when citizens cannot freely and securely exchange ideas. Octafish May 2013 #6
At least he didn't ProSense May 2013 #2
Worse: Comey approved the destruction of a human being's mind. Octafish May 2013 #3
absolutely horrifying. and we wonder why Bush warcrimes weren't pursued. nashville_brook May 2013 #24
There certainly is a break down in Justice. Octafish May 2013 #33
Actually Comey signed off on "kinder, gentler", torture. From the same article Luminous Animal May 2013 #9
The paragraph ProSense May 2013 #12
***Another fact based persepective from ProSense*** Thx much for the links uponit7771 May 2013 #19
Why won't you link to the article Glenn Greenwald wrote yesterday? NOVA_Dem May 2013 #37
Greenwald is currently still in his "split Progressives from Dems by any means possible" mode, struggle4progress Jun 2013 #46
"The Program" Comey, Goldsmith objected to is the NSA "Thin Thread" program leveymg May 2013 #4
replied to wrong post Autumn May 2013 #11
National Security Agency Whistleblower William Binney on Growing State Surveillance Octafish May 2013 #13
K&R. (nt) Kurovski May 2013 #5
When only certain people can be privy to the secrets of a nation... Octafish May 2013 #32
Recommended. H2O Man May 2013 #7
K&R nt Mnemosyne May 2013 #8
"Change" You Can't BeLIEve In! blkmusclmachine May 2013 #10
Hail to the new criminal boss...same as the old criminal boss. I've always MotherPetrie May 2013 #17
But, but ...he was one of the good guys...he stood up against...oh nevermind. Safetykitten May 2013 #14
It seemed some here came to the defense of this pick really fast too Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #15
Church. n/t L0oniX May 2013 #18
Back up Obama's ass.... pocoloco May 2013 #22
bwahahahaha... nashville_brook May 2013 #23
If they do come back, I wont know. I have the bunch on ignore. I was getting sick of their rhett o rick May 2013 #28
Is that ProSense May 2013 #30
OK ...let's all be good patriots and accept the implants. L0oniX May 2013 #16
K&R nt Eyerish May 2013 #20
Recommended Autumn May 2013 #21
Except all the news sources that matter contradicts these blatant lies. nt Pragdem May 2013 #25
Dont leave us hanging. Tell us more. nm rhett o rick May 2013 #26
Such as? Rex May 2013 #29
Rec'd Corruption Inc May 2013 #27
Comey is the one who appointed Fitzgerald to do the Plame leak investigation MinM May 2013 #31
Fitzgerald, after being praised so highly, was a weak fish, wasn't he? byeya May 2013 #34
As weak as Harry Reid. nt awoke_in_2003 May 2013 #45
yes I remember everyone being held accountable Skittles May 2013 #44
A felon and a torturer to head the FBI? It's unbelievably horrific Corruption Inc May 2013 #35
Jesus, with nominations like this, it seems we have a kinder, gentler, albeit more indepat May 2013 #36
well... NOVA_Dem May 2013 #38
Well, so much for the kinder and gentler bit indepat May 2013 #40
What is it with Obama and the GWB retreads? PufPuf23 May 2013 #39
Look at it as proliferation of the right-wing's agenda minus some of the really crazy indepat May 2013 #41
James Comey testifies before Senate Judiciary Coyotl May 2013 #42
Comey and Obama are 2 peas in a pro-warantless wiretapping pod. forestpath May 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's New FBI Chief App...»Reply #13