Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHB

(38,258 posts)
19. Let me add to that an illustration of where the brackets fell:
Fri May 31, 2013, 03:18 PM
May 2013

Most discussion of tax history mentions the top marginal rates of the past (91% in the 50s, 70% in the 60s and 70s, 50% through most of Reagan's presidency, etc.)

I like to highlight a different aspect: leaving aside what the rates were, where did they kick in? We live in times where people argue "are couples who make $250K 'rich'?" "Should we raise taxes on people who make over $250K? Over $500K?"

Where did these sorts of things lie in the past?

Using the inflation adjusted historical tax bracket tables from The Tax Foundation for married couples filing jointly, let's break it down a little and find out the equivalents in 2012 dollars:

1945:
Total number of brackets: 24
# of brackets affecting income over $250K: 14
# of brackets affecting income over $500K: 9
Top bracket affects income over: $2,551,044

1955:
Total number of brackets: 24
# of brackets affecting income over $250K: 16
# of brackets affecting income over $500K: 11
Top bracket affects income over: $3,426,776

1965:
Total number of brackets: 25
# of brackets affecting income over $250K: 13
# of brackets affecting income over $500K: 8
Top bracket affects income over: $1,457,740

1975:
Total number of brackets: 25
# of brackets affecting income over $250K: 9
# of brackets affecting income over $500K: 5
Top bracket affects income over: $853,509

1985:
Total number of brackets: 15
# of brackets affecting income over $250K: 1
# of brackets affecting income over $500K: 0
Top bracket affects income over: $360,650

1995:
Total number of brackets: 5
# of brackets affecting income over $250K: 1
# of brackets affecting income over $500K: 0
Top bracket affects income over: $386,423

2005:
Total number of brackets: 6
# of brackets affecting income over $250K: 1
# of brackets affecting income over $500K: 0
Top bracket affects income over: $383,773

2013:
Total number of brackets: 7
# of brackets affecting income over $250K: 2
# of brackets affecting income over $500K: 0
Top bracket affects income over: $440,876

Special Bonus Gipper edition numbers:
1988:
Total number of brackets: 2 (No, not a typo. Two brackets)
# of brackets affecting income over $250K: 0
# of brackets affecting income over $500K: 0

Top bracket affects income over: $57,738
(There was a reason why Poppy Bush had to go back on his 'Read My Lips' line. And every RWNJ wants to go back to this, or lower...)

ALL income tax progressivity for very high incomes was eliminated under Reagan, and has stayed that way ever since.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K & R !!! WillyT May 2013 #1
This is by design nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #2
Allow me to Pile On. bvar22 May 2013 #3
Rec this post and some telling charts - HughBeaumont May 2013 #10
Let me add to that an illustration of where the brackets fell: JHB May 2013 #19
Allow me to ProSense May 2013 #11
What would prices be to support the $90k Walmart employee? dkf May 2013 #4
How many Walmart employees are paid enough to be near the median? JHB May 2013 #5
If they all got paid $90k as a minimum wage how much would a can of coke cost? dkf May 2013 #6
I just bought 2 8-packs for $5 n2doc May 2013 #7
MEDIAN wage, not MINIMUM wage MNBrewer May 2013 #8
Please stop with the facts! HangOnKids May 2013 #15
I know... Liberal bias... MNBrewer May 2013 #16
And who was talking about a $90k minimum wage? JHB May 2013 #18
The point is, we DID increase production. snot Jun 2013 #24
Red herring....nobody expects WalMart employees to make median wage... Wounded Bear May 2013 #9
No one is saying Wal-mart employees should get $90K. But $17K is not a living wage. SunSeeker May 2013 #14
That's the talking point they used to justify slavery. Spitfire of ATJ May 2013 #21
probably the same, but the WALTONS would not be worth as much Skittles May 2013 #22
I'd add this. Initech May 2013 #12
K & R & Bookmarked! SunSeeker May 2013 #13
Why do you think smallcat88 May 2013 #17
kr HiPointDem May 2013 #20
K&R'd! snot Jun 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ROBERT REICH:If the media...»Reply #19