Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Frankenfoods reduce global warming [View all]roseBudd
(8,718 posts)25. Sprague-Dawley rats are the Angelina Jolie of research rats
Seralini used Sprague-Dawley rats.
http://www.nature.com/news/hyped-gm-maize-study-faces-growing-scrutiny-1.11566
http://www.science20.com/news_articles/700_researchers_call_gilleseric_seralini_release_gmo_test_data-95574
The serious demands by Seralini that regulatory bodies and the public make decisions about how food is grown based on his report require that he be transparent about the means and measures by which he has drawn conclusions, said Klaus Ammann, PhD, professor plant systems, Biosafety Committee of the Government of Switzerland, Chairman EFB Section on Biodiversity, University of Bern, Switzerland notes,. Anything less than the normal, full disclosures of data, leaves us all victims of political manipulation and highly theatrical propaganda this is not science.
The basic code of scientific ethics requires that scientists release all data associated with a peer reviewed scientific paper, noted Bruce Chassy, PhD, professor emeritus, Food Science&Nutrition, University of Illinois, United States.
The claims made by this study contradict an extensive body of independent and widely accepted scientific research, said C.S. Prakash, PhD, Professor, Plant Molecular Genetics, Tuskegee University. The few details shared about the Seralini study indicate significant flaws in common research and analytical practices, the only way to take this seriously is to allow an open review of the data behind these claims.
Hundreds of scientists are pointing to the recent findings by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the German Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food safety (BVL) and the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) which concluded that the Seralinis deductions are not justified because of shortcomings in study design, data evaluation and presentation methods. In the absence of disclosure, the petitioning scientists are calling on the publishing journal editors to retract the Seralini study.
Petition link: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dr-seralini-please-release-data/signatures
The basic code of scientific ethics requires that scientists release all data associated with a peer reviewed scientific paper, noted Bruce Chassy, PhD, professor emeritus, Food Science&Nutrition, University of Illinois, United States.
The claims made by this study contradict an extensive body of independent and widely accepted scientific research, said C.S. Prakash, PhD, Professor, Plant Molecular Genetics, Tuskegee University. The few details shared about the Seralini study indicate significant flaws in common research and analytical practices, the only way to take this seriously is to allow an open review of the data behind these claims.
Hundreds of scientists are pointing to the recent findings by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the German Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food safety (BVL) and the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) which concluded that the Seralinis deductions are not justified because of shortcomings in study design, data evaluation and presentation methods. In the absence of disclosure, the petitioning scientists are calling on the publishing journal editors to retract the Seralini study.
Petition link: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dr-seralini-please-release-data/signatures
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, now we have "superweeds" and even worse poison is being used to try and kill them.
djean111
Jun 2013
#1
No, I think we will be cutting down the rainforest in order to mine and drill and plant GMO crops.
djean111
Jun 2013
#5
How is that possibly related to GMO plants? You think GMOs faciliatate that somehow?
Buzz Clik
Jun 2013
#7
Obviously, and you and I were already discussing when you decided to open a parallel discussion.
Buzz Clik
Jun 2013
#16
Oh, but who has the time to care about preserving everyone who is polluting the planet
NoOneMan
Jun 2013
#61
I don't deny that rainforests are being cleared, but Monsanto's involvement is next to nothing.
Buzz Clik
Jun 2013
#15
The uncontrolled variable of allowing rodents to consume excessive energy and the complicating ....
roseBudd
Jun 2013
#91
I use Roundup on the stumps of invasive European Buckthorn, Japanese Honeysuckle...
roseBudd
Jun 2013
#29
No one is eating that asshole mulberry tree that tried to grow where it does not belong.
roseBudd
Jun 2013
#55
There were fewer deaths among the male rats that had drunk the highest concentration of Roundup
roseBudd
Jun 2013
#89
What they fail to report, however, is that the observed effects in many cases overlap with the
roseBudd
Jun 2013
#94
Guess someone poisoned the crickets too cause I'd be hearing them now otherwise...
Generic Other
Jun 2013
#60
How is advocating any form of conventional mono-cropping congruent with climate concern?
NoOneMan
Jun 2013
#100
I don't have to be a scientist to know that Monsanto is toxic to the planet.
forestpath
Jun 2013
#35
Rejecting research that is flawed is intellectual honesty. Calling someone a pimp is ad hominem
roseBudd
Jun 2013
#87
yeah, and if you killed a bunch of people there would be less co2 in the air. eom
ellenfl
Jun 2013
#47
Salmonella and E. Coli have killed people, not GM corn. Sprague-Dawley rats develop tumors
roseBudd
Jun 2013
#67
how do you know gm corn hasn't killed anyone? i know of some indian farmers it has killed. eom
ellenfl
Jun 2013
#76
A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health
prole_for_peace
Jun 2013
#66