Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This demonstrates my ignorance Cirque du So-What Jun 2013 #1
So... it's not the US government, it's federal contractors for the US government. Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #2
The Federal Government is using these underpaid workers thru rhett o rick Jun 2013 #3
avoiding prevailing wage & other standards is one of the reasons they're using contractors. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #9
You're so right, rhett, but we all know the purpose of 'contracting out' is to make wealthy indepat Jun 2013 #29
I have seen it first hand. Government workers that were making a decent wage rhett o rick Jun 2013 #31
The company owners get big bucks because, in part, they send a cut back... Amonester Jun 2013 #38
No, it's the government itself. Occulus Jun 2013 #64
They always write exceptions and exemptions into laws for themselves and their Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #4
Bingo. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #17
I also say bingo. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #32
Somehow I find this to be extremely hard to believe 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 #5
But does it work out that way? Exen Trik Jun 2013 #6
The law sulphurdunn Jun 2013 #13
Bush suspended the Davis-Bacon act after Katrina. alfredo Jun 2013 #26
That was for just one month. Lasher Jun 2013 #42
And that was because of Democrats pushing him. alfredo Jun 2013 #57
I find it extremely easy to believe. If you have evidence this is nonsense, please share. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #52
I spent a little over two decades as a Contracting Officer, so it is first hand experience 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 #63
Yes, those laws are supposed to dotymed Jun 2013 #60
Oh, that's EASY to fix. Occulus Jun 2013 #66
contractors don't have to hire americans they can use foreign visa workers. Sunlei Jun 2013 #7
If you can get security clearances for Chinese workers, I will be impressed (nt) jeff47 Jun 2013 #15
"subcontract stuff from china to fill their contracts" Sunlei Jun 2013 #18
And the people making those goods would still have to have a clearance jeff47 Jun 2013 #19
what's mic? Sunlei Jun 2013 #22
Military Industrial Complex jmowreader Jun 2013 #28
meals ready to eat contracts must give massive profits to the 'middleman' :) Sunlei Jun 2013 #47
During the Katrina reconstruction contractors subcontracted out, and did not hire alfredo Jun 2013 #27
you're right, remember reading all the locals who had jobs forever w/ seafood Sunlei Jun 2013 #48
I know... malokvale77 Jun 2013 #8
So, so sorry you're being exploited!! xynthee Jun 2013 #21
Appreciated. nt malokvale77 Jun 2013 #23
Hourly workers should be paid for all time spent in service of the employer. Skeeter Barnes Jun 2013 #25
I'm allowed 30 hours and not one minute more. malokvale77 Jun 2013 #30
Thank you for being one of the good home healthcare persons. Sunlei Jun 2013 #49
If YOU are a member of America's Working Class, bvar22 Jun 2013 #10
Oh. It's Impolite or Impolitic to say what you just said..You gotta get with the PROGRAM. KoKo Jun 2013 #36
Lots of great links.... thanks. midnight Jun 2013 #41
Nailed it. ctsnowman Jun 2013 #54
As a federal government employee, I can tell you that it requires more than the Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #11
Red herring or ... salib Jun 2013 #16
It is not necessary to be rude and a smart ass. Of course I know the difference between contractor Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #50
When government "CEOs" start pulling salaries in the hundreds of millions... KansDem Jun 2013 #12
The point of the OP was that the government is guilty of paying more employees low rhett o rick Jun 2013 #20
Yes...gotta read a lot..which you do...to reveal this...and it's sad that so many don't KoKo Jun 2013 #33
And as MORE and MORE of our Government functions are "privatized", bvar22 Jun 2013 #37
Pay to Play sulphurdunn Jun 2013 #14
Worthless eaters. Get out of the way of the Savvy Businessmen! blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #24
Have some experience with this madville Jun 2013 #34
OK, so what do the RWingers want? they can't have it both ways. They wanted the Gov to cut jobs kelliekat44 Jun 2013 #35
K&R midnight Jun 2013 #39
Really? You think the President can modify existing contracts unilaterally? jeff47 Jun 2013 #40
Wow, did you really think they were speaking of changing existing contracts?? Wow, that's totally rhett o rick Jun 2013 #43
Read your own quote. jeff47 Jun 2013 #44
LOL, and you thought that meant existing contracts. You should know he cant change rhett o rick Jun 2013 #45
Then explain, exactly, how an EO can give them a raise today. jeff47 Jun 2013 #46
du rec. xchrom Jun 2013 #51
This link contains absolutely no back up for the claim karynnj Jun 2013 #53
K & R ctsnowman Jun 2013 #55
As a gummit employee Le Taz Hot Jun 2013 #56
They started privatizing a lot of the low-skill jobs in order to "save money." alarimer Jun 2013 #58
Can someone post a link to the Service Employment Act? shawn703 Jun 2013 #59
Try searching for Service Contract Act instead. nt pinboy3niner Jun 2013 #62
Thanks but shawn703 Jun 2013 #65
As a state employee Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guess who is the largest ...»Reply #4