Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The problem [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)54. GOOGLE: Oxford human extinction technology
http://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/articles/global-commons-and-environment/existential-risk-prevention-global-priority
The biggest existential risks are anthropogenic and related to potential future technologies.
The biggest existential risks are anthropogenic and related to potential future technologies.
http://anewdomain.net/2013/04/25/oxford-future-of-humanity-institute-tech-existential-risk/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22002530
24 April 2013 Last updated at 05:42 ET
By Sean Coughlan
BBC News education correspondent
What are the greatest global threats to humanity? Are we on the verge of our own unexpected extinction?
An international team of scientists, mathematicians and philosophers at Oxford University's Future of Humanity Institute is investigating the biggest dangers.
And they argue in a research paper, Existential Risk Prevention as a Global Priority, that international policymakers must pay serious attention to the reality of species-obliterating risks. See: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.12002/abstract
<>
Dr Bostrom believes we've entered a new kind of technological era with the capacity to threaten our future as never before. These are "threats we have no track record of surviving".
Lack of control
Likening it to a dangerous weapon in the hands of a child, he says the advance of technology has overtaken our capacity to control the possible consequences.
Experiments in areas such as synthetic biology, nanotechnology and machine intelligence are hurtling forward into the territory of the unintended and unpredictable.
Synthetic biology, where biology meets engineering, promises great medical benefits. But Dr Bostrom is concerned about unforeseen consequences in manipulating the boundaries of human biology.
Nanotechnology, working at a molecular or atomic level, could also become highly destructive if used for warfare, he argues. He has written that future governments will have a major challenge to control and restrict misuses.
There are also fears about how artificial or machine intelligence interact with the external world.
Such computer-driven "intelligence" might be a powerful tool in industry, medicine, agriculture or managing the economy.
But it also can be completely indifferent to any incidental damage.
Unintended consequences
These are not abstract concepts.
<>
24 April 2013 Last updated at 05:42 ET
By Sean Coughlan
BBC News education correspondent
What are the greatest global threats to humanity? Are we on the verge of our own unexpected extinction?
An international team of scientists, mathematicians and philosophers at Oxford University's Future of Humanity Institute is investigating the biggest dangers.
And they argue in a research paper, Existential Risk Prevention as a Global Priority, that international policymakers must pay serious attention to the reality of species-obliterating risks. See: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.12002/abstract
<>
Dr Bostrom believes we've entered a new kind of technological era with the capacity to threaten our future as never before. These are "threats we have no track record of surviving".
Lack of control
Likening it to a dangerous weapon in the hands of a child, he says the advance of technology has overtaken our capacity to control the possible consequences.
Experiments in areas such as synthetic biology, nanotechnology and machine intelligence are hurtling forward into the territory of the unintended and unpredictable.
Synthetic biology, where biology meets engineering, promises great medical benefits. But Dr Bostrom is concerned about unforeseen consequences in manipulating the boundaries of human biology.
Nanotechnology, working at a molecular or atomic level, could also become highly destructive if used for warfare, he argues. He has written that future governments will have a major challenge to control and restrict misuses.
There are also fears about how artificial or machine intelligence interact with the external world.
Such computer-driven "intelligence" might be a powerful tool in industry, medicine, agriculture or managing the economy.
But it also can be completely indifferent to any incidental damage.
Unintended consequences
These are not abstract concepts.
<>
More:
http://cser.org/
http://www.existential-risk.org/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I hope I dont get Neil in a lot of trouble here, but I think he is God. Yeah, the real God.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#5
If you listen to NPR and watch PBS in the rural South they think you're a gay commie Al Queda spy
coldmountain
Jun 2013
#26
What breaks my heart about about America is the growth of willful ignorance
coldmountain
Jun 2013
#24
Nice, but what are we doing to work toward a solution? I can find a thousand opinions about
jtuck004
Jun 2013
#23
If you're not finding solutions, it is only because you are not looking for them. Dr. DeGrasse-Tyson
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2013
#32
Are you're saying that you lack the capacity to learn because you're old?
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2013
#48
To nitpick just a little - I love Neil - but it's not that adults nowadays don't know science. I'd
Nay
Jun 2013
#42
Stupid stands out when set next to intelligent. They don't like that so they attack.
L0oniX
Jun 2013
#43
True; my point was, though, that 'stupid' used to be ashamed of being stupid/ignorant, and
Nay
Jun 2013
#44
You're right, it isn't. Today the stupid/ignorant are fiercely proud of it and will go to
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2013
#55
ABSOLUTELY correct. TOO MANY ADULTS don't know what science is, how it works, or what it means.
patrice
Jun 2013
#45