Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimlup

(8,010 posts)
6. It seems to me that the difficulty is really the 501(c)(4) tax except status...
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 08:55 PM
Jun 2013

which seems awkwardly defined. This is an umbrella group status for partisan political activity.

From wiki:

Tax exemption

United States federal tax law, specifically Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 501(c)), generally exempts certain types of nonprofit organizations from federal income tax. The statutory language of IRC 501(c)(4) generally requires civic organizations described in that section to be "operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare". Treasury regulations interpreting this statutory language apply a more relaxed standard, namely, that the organization "is operated primarily for the purpose of bringing about civic betterments and social improvements."[3] As a result, the IRS traditionally has permitted organizations described in IRC 501(c)(4) to engage in lobbying and political campaign activities if those activities are not the organization's primary activity.[4]


Seems that we should just end this charade.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

of course it's reported in the furren press ... zbdent Jun 2013 #1
'Course. Cha Jun 2013 #10
Let us get the full details about this Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2013 #2
Relevance? Igel Jun 2013 #3
I think ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2013 #14
He had it right the first time jmowreader Jun 2013 #22
gave evidence that suggests the reality may have been more complex AlbertCat Jun 2013 #4
Which begs the question? kentuck Jun 2013 #5
Perhaps the groups were communicating with each other? cstanleytech Jun 2013 #23
It seems to me that the difficulty is really the 501(c)(4) tax except status... jimlup Jun 2013 #6
I seem to recall a youtube video of Elizabeth Warren grilling someone Veilex Jun 2013 #17
So what did the IRS apologize for when they tossed this out there? Skip Intro Jun 2013 #7
It was very odd - the whole public apology thing. Merlot Jun 2013 #9
Yes, it was a planted question. The "admission" was orchestrated, well planned. Skip Intro Jun 2013 #11
Would we need to know more about her? Merlot Jun 2013 #12
We need to know what the truth is. It may be more about her. Skip Intro Jun 2013 #13
Repubs posing as Democrats not liking this one Kingofalldems Jun 2013 #8
That was in the report. The report which set this whole thing off. Which apparently no one bothered Chathamization Jun 2013 #15
Lerner planted John2 Jun 2013 #21
Yep, the report makes it clear that it was done on behalf of members of Congress Chathamization Jun 2013 #24
. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #16
I'm moving to the beach! burnodo Jun 2013 #18
Kick this one Kingofalldems Jun 2013 #19
The chicken hawk RepubliClowns got nuttin, and are whining like stuck pigs Berlum Jun 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»IRS tax scandal in US: ne...»Reply #6