Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Bradley Manning's Legal Duty to Expose War Crimes [View all]
Bradley Manning's Legal Duty to Expose War Crimes
Monday, 03 June 2013 09:29
By Marjorie Cohn, Truthout | News Analysis
The court-martial of Bradley Manning, the most significant whistleblower case since Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers, has begun. Although Manning pled guilty earlier this year to 10 offenses that will garner him 20 years in custody, military prosecutors insist on pursuing charges of aiding the enemy and violation of the Espionage Act, carrying life in prison. The Obama administration, which has prosecuted more whistleblowers under the Espionage Act than all prior presidencies combined, seeks to send a strong message to would-be whistleblowers to keep their mouths shut.
A legal duty to report war crimes
Manning is charged with crimes for sending hundreds of thousands of classified files, documents and videos, including the "Collateral Murder" video, the "Iraq War Logs," the "Afghan War Logs" and State Department cables to Wikileaks. Many of the things he transmitted contain evidence of war crimes.
The "Collateral Murder" video depicts a US Apache attack helicopter killing 12 civilians and wounding two children on the ground in Baghdad in 2007. The helicopter then fired on and killed the people trying to rescue the wounded. Finally, a US tank drove over one of the bodies, cutting the man in half. These acts constitute three separate war crimes.
Manning fulfilled his legal duty to report war crimes. He complied with his legal duty to obey lawful orders but also his legal duty to disobey unlawful orders. ...........................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://truth-out.org/news/item/16731-bradley-mannings-legal-duty-to-expose-war-crimes
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why should he be pardoned? He had the option of whistleblowing under the law, and he chose a
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#7
I think he had personal motivations related to his interpersonal conflicts. Nothing
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#24
"MSM" had nothing to do with the options he had to report the few items of wrongdoing.
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#121
Really? His buddy Libby covered for him in the Valerie Plame affair and took the fall by
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#81
An elected official is always under oath, or didn't you know that? When one of them
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#125
You're seriously defending Cheney now? The Constitution is the Statute, the law of the
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#139
Well, the 'perhaps' part is the problem....while I would love to see Cheney behind
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#66
Okay---take the report, and tell me what you would charge Cheney with. I don't disagree
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#72
We should have had that material made available to us right here in the US for the past 60
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#87
I don't believe anyone said that diplomats shouldn't be able to speak to each in confidence
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#138
Every criminal torturer in the CIA, DOJ's OLC and war criminals Bush & Cheney
Dragonfli
Jun 2013
#120
He should have utilized the Army IG or written to his Congressman. He did neither. His
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#4
That's true, I just presumed he would use his local representative to do that.
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#11
No--any Congressperson will do. That way, if Ted Cruz is your Senator, you can still
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#12
I agreed with you. I just presumed he would have written to his local representative,
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#35
One of the stupider articles published at Truthout--and that's really saying a lot.
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#5
The writer of the article is sloppy. I think that's worse than being wrong in the case of
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#41
700k records, and people pretend he read them. The more I find out about him,
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#29
I've already shown in another thread that it would have taken him approximately ten years
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#37
The farthest left, donation cup in hand, have a reason for pushing that meme--it makes
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#39
Which one of the over 700k documents he released detailed a war crime? The answer is
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#54
The result of looking forward. It's all fine now that the blue jerseys are the perpetrators. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2013
#101
It blames Obama for a "war crime" in the last paragraph and that's all the law it needs:
ucrdem
Jun 2013
#73
The guys who murdered the civilians walk free while the guy who exposed them is on trial.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#80
Three separate wars crimes associated with one attack: wonder if there were others?
indepat
Jun 2013
#102
A war of aggression is a war crime under international law. All that follows in commission of a war
indepat
Jun 2013
#142
Bradley Manning's Legal Duty to follow the Military Whistleblower Protection Act
hack89
Jun 2013
#136