Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Bradley Manning is guilty, he doesn't deserve sympathy. [View all]SlimJimmy
(3,251 posts)53. He should be punished according to the UCMJ. That would not include hanging. But your over the top
rhetoric is duly noted.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
219 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
depends on whether the alleged crime is actually a crime. following orders is not a defense nt
msongs
Jun 2013
#1
Yes. Some people can't understand that there is a difference between law and morality.
Zorra
Jun 2013
#145
Whistleblowers, especially security whistleblowers have the current system working against them...
cascadiance
Jun 2013
#211
No chance. So many of us are like the five-year-old child that doesn't want to go to school.
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2013
#7
Then he should have accepted that fact, rather than stoop to breaking the goddamn law. nt
Pragdem
Jun 2013
#36
By regulation, the Army IG must open an investigation into the allegations. Once that
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#107
Pure conjecture on your part. We'll never know since he decided to release the
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#179
"against their will"? Do you think any prisoner is "willingly" locked up? That doesn't make sense
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#78
It's so disgusting when people try to compare scum like Manning/Assange to MLK. nt
Pragdem
Jun 2013
#38
He was very naughty. He actually thought the people in a democracy should know what their
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#9
Serious answer. Avoid wars and getting involved in other countries conflicts.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#21
A serious question. Have you ever been in the military or held a security clearance of any kind?
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#37
If Manning is guilty - what about the Americans who murdered civilians, ran secret torture prisons..
OutNow
Jun 2013
#15
No one can argue that information relating to national security doesnt need to be protected.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#28
He released the names of both foreign and military sources. Is that sensitive enough for you?
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#40
He should be punished according to the UCMJ. That would not include hanging. But your over the top
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#53
Manning released the names of both foreign and military sources. Some were open others
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#95
Blah, blah, blah. Cheney is responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent children
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#123
again, i agree with you on the double standard - that is a legit point
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#141
Let's put it this way - As long as Cheney walks free, Manning should be able to also.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#54
Is there a poll showing "99%" support for Manning, or is this just more of the usual "rhettorick"?
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#83
This is the problem with being an internet liberal today, you have to believe that.....
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#92
"Military Law", ah yes, the ultimate in authoritarian rule. I can see why some worship at it's
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#120
Sooner or later you will have to choose a side. And if you continue to choose the side of the
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#125
Thanks for the heads up. You have completely mis-characterized my position, but
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#190
Maybe I made a mistake. Isnt your position on Manning the same as Sean Hannity? nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#192
My position on Manning is the same as half the people on DU and ove half the
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#195
My fear is that most Americans will go easily into the darkness of fascism. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#121
As long as they are kept fat, happy and entertained/anesthetized they may do exactly that.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jun 2013
#128
I wouldn't label him as evil either. But what he did was incredibly stupid, and criminal.
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#96
The point is that there are two standards. One for the 1%, which apparently you subscribe, and
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#127
If you dont know, then I assume you think everything is fine. The poverty level is a-ok.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#146
The 99% cant prosecute Cheney for murdering tens of thousands, yet you support the prosecution of
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#149
If that rationalization makes you feel better, more power to you. Manning in prison and Cheney free
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#153
In that case disregard my question in another reply. Since you were in the Marine Corps,
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#44
Cheney exposed a hundred undercover operatives and no one cared. Now you care because a Pfc
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#147
If it was just Cheney maybe I could agree. But a good share of the Ruling Elite
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#175
The UCMJ does not determine whether he was a whistleblower. I don't think he expects leniency.
leveymg
Jun 2013
#61
He would have been a whistle blower if he had followed the proper protocol to report the
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#109
When someone tells me without qualifier who does or does not deserve sympathy
LanternWaste
Jun 2013
#35
I hope he gets a reduced sentence simply because he was very confused emotionally.
randome
Jun 2013
#85
Under current federal law, he had the obligation to not publish any document that he knew might
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#110
Even if he is not a U.S. citizen and didn't publish it on an American server?
NaturalHigh
Jun 2013
#112
But Manning is not trying to get away, he is not trying to avoid accountability.
bemildred
Jun 2013
#168
I don't, I'm awake at 3:30 in the morning, expecting to get a root canal at 9:00 AM
bemildred
Jun 2013
#172
Because of his position, he knew the information would get nowhere, if he followed the rules.
RC
Jun 2013
#200
Manning knew that before the fact, that nothing would come of it, if he went through channels.
RC
Jun 2013
#216
Since he's already plead guilty to 10 of the charges, I think he may agree with you, I certainly do.
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#77
Good luck with that! I think the consensus is that he won't get life, but he'll surely do 20.
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#82
Ya got me. I'm not familiar with military sentencing, but NPR did a segment today with a journalist
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#86
Felix, as I understand it, something like 77,000 files were turned over by Manning.
NaturalHigh
Jun 2013
#90
"Heroes don't commit crimes that they believe to be for just causes..." etc, what meaningless drivel
sibelian
Jun 2013
#180
He should have complained to the very people who committed the crimes. Makes sense.
idwiyo
Jun 2013
#167
No matter how you frame it, some here will cling to the notion that what he did was
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#187
Torture is a crime. War of agression is a crime. I would have done exactly the same thing Bradley
idwiyo
Jun 2013
#199
Official channels for exposing war crimes? You mean those same official channels for reporting rape?
Dash87
Jun 2013
#176
Marjorie Cohn: "Manning had a legal duty to reveal the commission of war crimes....
Trillo
Jun 2013
#208
He could have done that by informing the Army IG or Congress as required by regulation.
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#214