Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
"No, because it is rude to interrupt anyone while they are speaking." Except when you're GWB and Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #1
That was still rude. bluedigger Jun 2013 #12
That 'someone' was an Iraqi. Last time I checked Michelle didn't murder anyone's family. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #53
I'll go with option #2. Brigid Jun 2013 #2
Agreed Sherman A1 Jun 2013 #47
Definitely loyalsister Jun 2013 #81
If Laura Bush was heckled back then, we all would probably cheer here. Whisp Jun 2013 #3
I agree 100% - don't start the fight and then whine about your target confronting you! hedgehog Jun 2013 #64
Some here would condemn that too treestar Jun 2013 #76
That is not true etherealtruth Jun 2013 #87
I recall a lot of Laura bashing here back then. Whisp Jun 2013 #88
I can remember thinking etherealtruth Jun 2013 #95
Not me. I'm against heckling, period, since IT INTERFERES WITH OTHERS' RIGHT TO hear the speaker. Honeycombe8 Jun 2013 #91
I voted 1, but she's not a private citizen BainsBane Jun 2013 #4
Discrimination is worth yelling about. LeftyMom Jun 2013 #5
She wasn't just yelling. She was interrupting a speech on anotehr topic & preventing others Honeycombe8 Jun 2013 #92
Go read the first amendment. LeftyMom Jun 2013 #96
The First Amendment isn't "operative" in a private home. Also, the hosts of the party were a MADem Jun 2013 #97
I voted "Other". No, it's normally not OK to heckle the First Lady stevenleser Jun 2013 #6
It depends on why she is being heckled. nt rrneck Jun 2013 #7
you left out "yes only if she is a republican". is it "proper"?! please... boilerbabe Jun 2013 #8
In the other thread on the subject defacto7 Jun 2013 #9
Nobody interfered with her right to free speech. bluedigger Jun 2013 #14
I don't know if you're agreeing with me or not... defacto7 Jun 2013 #15
I was just weighing in. bluedigger Jun 2013 #16
yes, of course, this is the fuckin' United States of America quinnox Jun 2013 #10
Under Obama, Free Speech -- Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #23
I am starting to think this place resembles FR under Herr Bush the Appointed LonePirate Jun 2013 #52
Oh, DU passed that - Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #56
What utter horseshit leftynyc Jun 2013 #62
Family of POTUS KentuckyWoman Jun 2013 #11
That's right Floyd_Gondolli Jun 2013 #84
Yes, if its for a very good reason bhikkhu Jun 2013 #13
I thought about the Supreme Court earlier today too when I first heard about the heckler. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #17
...decision expected around the end of June bhikkhu Jun 2013 #27
Thanks, for some reason I was thinking that it was going to be August. n/t Tx4obama Jun 2013 #31
So an unmarried LGBT citizen must suffer while waiting for a DOMA decision on marriage? LonePirate Jun 2013 #51
I believe Obama will wait to sign the EO until after the SC DOMA ruling comes out. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #73
It's never proper...that's the point. It may sometimes be appropriate. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #18
I support free speech and the heckling is free speech. Apophis Jun 2013 #19
She wasn't elected, she isn't getting paid for anything, Warpy Jun 2013 #20
No, and it never has been either. Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #21
Free speech - Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #22
Which means I'm free to express my displeasure at you... TheMadMonk Jun 2013 #44
Of course you are. Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #55
Of course, the question wasn't whether she had such a "right" dems_rightnow Jun 2013 #86
"End of story" so no reason to debate Phelps family's obnoxious heckling Raine Jun 2013 #49
Yes, I support the right -- Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #50
hear, hear Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #67
Heckling is just rude by definition RedCappedBandit Jun 2013 #24
Michelle handled it. The heckler whined about it, LOL! DevonRex Jun 2013 #25
Proper? No. Permissable? Yes. nt Deep13 Jun 2013 #26
If you ignore us, we will make sure you're made aware. Gravitycollapse Jun 2013 #28
It's "legal" from a "free speech" angle, but it's tacky, tasteless and generally attracts negative MADem Jun 2013 #29
And 'jobs for veterans' too... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #34
Yes, that is a project I find most admirable--and it resonates with a lot of military families. nt MADem Jun 2013 #43
If you want to hang on that thread then ACT as a private citizen and get off the stump TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #89
No she is not "acting as a politician." She's acting as a supporter of politicians, and that is a MADem Jun 2013 #94
No life long demo Jun 2013 #30
What does "proper" mean? What does "heckle" mean? Bonobo Jun 2013 #32
Well ma'am, don't hold yer breath waiting for any money :) n/t Tx4obama Jun 2013 #36
Amen - GetEqual is an EPIC FAIL of advocacy. Stupid assholes. ZRT2209 Jun 2013 #42
Apparently it's the hip thing to heckle the wrong people. Jamaal510 Jun 2013 #33
Since the DOMA case is in front of the SCOTUS right now, imo the heckler should be in front... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #35
+1 .... they want a KING, when it's a member of "our" team... nt MADem Jun 2013 #40
In general I don't think it is proper. But if for example the country was heading into an unjust war Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #37
Michelle Obama has made herself a public figure. BlueCheese Jun 2013 #38
i think 'proper' is the wrong word because it can be taken to mean polite or civil. it's not polite, HiPointDem Jun 2013 #39
It might be rude but I don't think any public figure is exempt from being heckled Blasphemer Jun 2013 #41
I don't think it is "proper" to heckle anyone. Behind the Aegis Jun 2013 #45
A core of activists seem to think alienating people is a good way to advance their cause Recursion Jun 2013 #46
No, not even when FL is a repug. It's rude, obnoxious and a turn-off to whatever issue the Raine Jun 2013 #48
I voted sometimes. For instance, had Michelle said, "Gays are an abomination", then heckle her. ieoeja Jun 2013 #54
It is never "proper" to heckle anyone. bemildred Jun 2013 #57
I swear that I read this as "Is it proper to tickle the First Lady..." AngryAmish Jun 2013 #58
LOL. Something similar happened to me last night... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #74
I voted for being rude to anyone when they're speaking, but AndyA Jun 2013 #59
Yes. And it doesn't matter which party it is. William769 Jun 2013 #60
I voted "Yes, anywhere / anytime." Welcome to...AMERICA. nt Poll_Blind Jun 2013 #61
Me too Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #68
No. But people are 100% free to do so and look asinine. -nt CakeGrrl Jun 2013 #63
Don't want to be heckled? Don't give a speech. The Straight Story Jun 2013 #65
Then the flipside should apply CakeGrrl Jun 2013 #66
No, it would'nt be a question at all. Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #70
Proper? I don't think so, to be honest. Sheldon Cooper Jun 2013 #69
Ir may not be proper, it may be rude, but depending on the policy... tokenlib Jun 2013 #71
Yes, so long as they paid the $100 to get in FarCenter Jun 2013 #72
It is improper treestar Jun 2013 #75
Sure, if she's done something worth heckling Scootaloo Jun 2013 #77
It is acceptable. nt bike man Jun 2013 #78
Only if it has to do with something the First Lady is actually making part of her agenda. Ian David Jun 2013 #79
It's seems alot more rude to allow federal contractors to discriminate against gays. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #80
Btw, for those that have not yet heard... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #82
I don't really care if the FLOTUS gets "heckled"-it's an exercise in pointlessness. Boomerproud Jun 2013 #93
where is the line between heckling and challenging...? mike_c Jun 2013 #83
That sorta depends on whether you think "civil" has any meaning to "civilization". -nt Liberal Veteran Jun 2013 #85
NO. IT INTERFERES WITH OTHERS' RIGHT to hear the speech, she doesn't make policy, Honeycombe8 Jun 2013 #90
Every person who steps up onto the Soap Box exposes themselves to hecklers. 'Twas ever thus. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #98
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll: Is it proper to he...»Reply #36