Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Iterate

(3,021 posts)
31. The phrase is older than that, and far more varied in its meanings.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 05:44 PM
Feb 2012

Here's one source, citing an early usage:

February 1, 2012
Well, clutch the pearls!
...

Of course people have been literally clutching their pearls in shock or otherwise for a long time. Here, for example, is a citation from a 1910 issue of the Chambers Journal, a weekly magazine that published fiction and nonfiction:

“Without being aware that I had stirred, I found myself close to the table. I drew a gasping breath, and my hand went out without any conscious volition and clutched the pearls.”
http://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2012/02/orient.html


I remember the phrase when growing up and thought little of it. At different times it's also meant "hanging on to ones wealth", or to "grab someones testicles", or "hanging on to a treasured memory", or "fear of robbery". The author you cite, Torie Bosch, is pretty selective in her sources and only mentions the meanings that build on her narrative. She might mention the 1997 article by Amy Loudermilk "Clutching Pearls: Speculations on a Twentieth-Century Suicide" (republished in 2002 in River Teeth), but it wouldn't fit.

I'd like to cite those, and others with links, but I've limited out on viewing those Google books. They are in the top of the books search.

The phrase doesn't appear often enough to be registered by Google's Ngram viewer, which only has sources indexed through 2008 anyway. Some of the other similar phrases mentioned in the thread do appear:

http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=smelling+salts%2Cfainting+couch%2Cuptight%2C&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3

By far the bulk of the usage has been in the past 2-3 years. To get to the point I'm trying to make, when meanings and usages shift that quickly, you can't be sure that everyone means the same thing. In fact, you can be pretty sure that they don't all mean the same thing, and should be very wary about deciding that they intend the worst, most misogynistic or homophobic meaning.

This isn't going to last long anyway. The sources which are using it now burn through shallow phrases quickly.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

phooey.. Repubs, (male & female), clutch their pearls ALL THE TIME. annabanana Feb 2012 #1
You could just as easily say the phrase is homophobic, given the origin. DCKit Feb 2012 #2
I don't find it offensive. Perhaps because it so perfectly decribes republican faux outrage. msanthrope Feb 2012 #3
Exactly. It describes the kind of douchebag... backscatter712 Feb 2012 #25
I am lightend up, Francis. ellisonz Feb 2012 #28
Let's just ban all humor from now on. lunatica Feb 2012 #4
+1 nt Javaman Feb 2012 #16
+2 nt zappaman Feb 2012 #37
but how could they argue if they didnt yell pearl clutcher... seabeyond Feb 2012 #5
Clutching pearls over the phrase "pearl-clutching"... backscatter712 Feb 2012 #6
I'm not clutching a damn thing. ellisonz Feb 2012 #29
I think the phrase wouldn't be so divisive on DU justiceischeap Feb 2012 #7
+1 n/t tammywammy Feb 2012 #8
+1 redqueen Feb 2012 #11
discussion does not need to rise, anywhere. it is used immediately. used in a manner to denigrade, seabeyond Feb 2012 #12
Totally agree. I've seen it used that way Raine Feb 2012 #35
+1000 Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #13
It's not. annabanana Feb 2012 #14
I know you asked for examples of women, but I'm gonna mix it up justiceischeap Feb 2012 #20
I agree, from now on I'll just say snooper2 Feb 2012 #18
That'd be preferable. At least it'd be honest. justiceischeap Feb 2012 #22
This, so this. (nt) redqueen Feb 2012 #27
+1 obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #21
One small point... ellisonz Feb 2012 #30
I think "pearl-clutcher", I think "uptight asshole" JNelson6563 Feb 2012 #9
Certainly misogynist in origin but it seems to have become a more neutral term with use. nt TBF Feb 2012 #10
Should we get rid of the term hysterical? MattBaggins Feb 2012 #15
Aye yi yi zappaman Feb 2012 #38
Yes. n/t ellisonz Feb 2012 #39
What's the next outrage? hootinholler Feb 2012 #17
Smelling salts. I mean, the only time I've ever seen them used were on hetero men who had msanthrope Feb 2012 #26
I have never thought of "pearl clutchers" as misogynist. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #19
Pearl-clutching is no longer about gender, sexual orientation, or even pearls rocktivity Feb 2012 #41
Much ado about nothing (n/t) FlaGatorJD Feb 2012 #23
Apparently it bothers some people.. dixiegrrrrl Feb 2012 #24
The phrase is older than that, and far more varied in its meanings. Iterate Feb 2012 #31
Given that... ellisonz Feb 2012 #32
I wouldn't use it on a bet. Iterate Feb 2012 #33
Agreed. ellisonz Feb 2012 #34
Ironically, the very first time I heard the expression was on the TV show "The First 48" rocktivity Feb 2012 #36
Kick. ellisonz Feb 2012 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Plague of Pearl Clutchi...»Reply #31