Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

auburngrad82

(5,029 posts)
34. Then every wealthy alcoholic who needed a new liver would be able to buy their way to the top
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:48 PM
Jun 2013

of the list, even though there were people who needed that liver just as badly.

The rules are established to prevent abuse and to protect people.

As was stated earlier in this thread, the girl is at the top of the list for a child's lung. As was also stated earlier, the use of an adult lung in a child of her age would be very complicated. What happens if they use the adult lung, cut it down to size to fit the child, and then it fails? She's back to square one and that lung could have been used for an adult who needed it is no longer available.

Do you think that if a person can afford to pay for a transplant that might not work because of problems such as, in this case, incompatible size, that their ability to pay for it trumps the needs of everyone else? That was the root of the controversy involving Mickey Mantle's liver transplant. He may not have purchased his way to the top of the list but it appeared that he did and many people were upset that a life long alcoholic would be moved up the list ahead of other people. People felt it was his fame that moved him up the list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_Mantle#Illness_and_death

"Mantle received a liver transplant at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, on June 8, 1995. His liver was severely damaged by alcohol-induced cirrhosis, as well as hepatitis C. Prior to the operation, doctors also discovered he had inoperable liver cancer known as an undifferentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, further facilitating the need for a transplant. In July, he had recovered enough to deliver a press conference at Baylor, and noted that many fans had looked to him as a role model. "This is a role model: Don't be like me," a frail Mantle said. He also established the Mickey Mantle Foundation to raise awareness for organ donations. Soon, he was back in the hospital, where it was found that his cancer was rapidly spreading throughout his body.

"Though Mantle was very popular, his liver transplant was a source of some controversy. Some felt that his fame had permitted him to receive a donor liver in just one day, bypassing other patients who had been waiting for much longer. Mantle's doctors insisted that the decision was based solely on medical criteria, but acknowledged that the very short wait created the appearance of favoritism."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If I am not mistaken it has to do with her age. The girl is 10 yrs old and I think she has to be southernyankeebelle Jun 2013 #1
I know it is her age. My question is is it a long standing policy (before Obama) or is it something patricia92243 Jun 2013 #7
If it wasn't a government policy could HHS even have a say in the matter? Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #17
I am not sure but I think it has been that way before the President. People give the office southernyankeebelle Jun 2013 #27
The right wing (and even some progressives) Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #9
True southernyankeebelle Jun 2013 #26
She isn't being denied lapfog_1 Jun 2013 #2
Do you know WHEN the committee of surgeons made this rule - before Obama Care or after it? That and patricia92243 Jun 2013 #11
It doesn't matter. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #14
I don't see how that makes it worth defending. Quite the opposite, really. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #18
Seriously? Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #21
Are you saying medical policy should be set by political hacks? Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #25
I'm saying organ donations need to be regulated, strictly regulated. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #31
And you're arguing to have the next Pat Robertson demand his preferred HHS Sec'y. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #33
so you think there should be no rules? Seriously? bowens43 Jun 2013 #22
If someone can obtain competent treatment by their own means Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #23
you are still dancing around the topic. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #32
I'm not dancing. I'm saying unequivocally Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #35
no you continue to dance Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #38
From donors, obviously. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #40
Could the doctors pay donors and charge recipients market rates? Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #45
If paying donations increased the supply would you oppose an increased supply? Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #49
Then every wealthy alcoholic who needed a new liver would be able to buy their way to the top auburngrad82 Jun 2013 #34
Health care decisions are between patient and doctor. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #39
Not always auburngrad82 Jun 2013 #42
That's not an endorsement of political hacks, incompetent bureaucrats and crony appointees. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #43
In my case thank God for the government rule doing away with lifetime maximums auburngrad82 Jun 2013 #44
I'm delighted you got treatment. I lost my MIL not long ago to a cancer that overtook her too fast. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #47
There is a shortage of parts and a waiting list for those parts. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #46
Congrtulations. You won. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #48
Another victory for you. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #55
How is the government not going to be involved in organ transplants? yellowcanine Jun 2013 #52
If resource scarcity is a rationale -- Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #53
I don't follow your logic. Scarcity demands that decisions have to be made. yellowcanine Jun 2013 #56
. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #58
"another family could be incentivized to provide the transplant organs" The donor has to be dead yellowcanine Jun 2013 #59
kill junior for his kidneys and collect 1,000,000 from some billionaire in renal failure. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #61
I read the rules have been in place since 2005. RudynJack Jun 2013 #24
the United Network for Organ Sharing seltzerwater Jun 2013 #57
I do think there is room to make adjustments on this... cynatnite Jun 2013 #13
I agree that there is always room to review older rules and see if they are still appropriate Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #16
I don't blame the parents for seeking an exemption... cynatnite Jun 2013 #19
I don't blame them for wanting an exemption. Who wouldn't? Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #28
No atreides1 Jun 2013 #3
I tried that but could never get a date on any of it - I find this stuff very tedious to read and patricia92243 Jun 2013 #12
rightwingers on facebook have been saying our government is too busy promoting same sex boilerbabe Jun 2013 #4
Of course not leftynyc Jun 2013 #5
Consider the source Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #6
If anyone complains about this gollygee Jun 2013 #8
Its a rule from UNOS which was a pet project of Al Gore when he... GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #10
No, it doesn't. It has to do with her age. REP Jun 2013 #15
If this is the same little girl, she has been moved to the adult list. The rule bike man Jun 2013 #20
If you read a lot of comment boards (i.e. Politico) Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #29
Yes both Obama and the IRS ... obnoxiousdrunk Jun 2013 #30
Don't forget Benghazi! Zoeisright Jun 2013 #37
That's because she was denied because of her age. Zoeisright Jun 2013 #36
No, it's Obamacare. That's one piece of $%# legislation we will own forever. nt Demo_Chris Jun 2013 #54
About 19,700,000 results (0.16 seconds) when searching 'Obamacare'. nt bike man Jun 2013 #60
No. Transplant rules are made by groups of surgeons magical thyme Jun 2013 #41
No I am a transplant nurse ismnotwasm Jun 2013 #50
actually, the reverse is now true-the repubs forced someone else to probably die to move her ahead. graham4anything Jun 2013 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question about girl denie...»Reply #34