Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)

19. Prove that the calls were not interecepted.

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Reply #18)

Thu Jun 6, 2013, 02:26 PM

Jun 2013

I have an easier time believing that they were, which would explain the massive facilities they have built all over the nation. Don't tell me that that is all for foreign use, that's the propaganda. If all the NSA wanted was international calls, then they could easily grab those real time from satellites and relay points in a few discrete locations. Yet we have massive facilities all over the place, with tons of processing equipment, all to keep track of what number you called internationally? Nuts.

If you are willing to believe it. Good luck, as for me? I answer the phone. Fuck Hoover.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

And as usual, when I wrote I knew calls were intercepted [View all] nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 OP

There are plenty of people here who are OK with Stasi type surveillance. hobbit709 Jun 2013 #1

Neither am I. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #2

The only way I am OK with it is because hollysmom Jun 2013 #3

That's more reason for it to be a horribly bad thing. Myrina Jun 2013 #5

my preference as well hollysmom Jun 2013 #8

The Sequester forced them to cut back on engineers to monitor the data anyways. randome Jun 2013 #9

Did you leap from metadata provided by Verizon to 'call interception'? randome Jun 2013 #4

You never fail to inject yourself into a story Floyd_Gondolli Jun 2013 #6

Unrec. What call interceptions? FSogol Jun 2013 #7

I guess you missed the program with Verizon nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #10

Missed the program? Yeah, the US media blows, but I guess that's something you DO know about. FSogol Jun 2013 #12

I guess some of us get it, some of us don't nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #16

I think you're confused about what intercepting means Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #13

Thank you maddezmom Jun 2013 #14

Stop already with the facts! HappyMe Jun 2013 #28

No calls were "intercepted". This wasn't wiretapping Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #11

Yeah, and we can believe them Savannahmann Jun 2013 #17

So this instance of Verizon record collection was infact warrantless wiretapping of calls? Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #18

Prove that the calls were not interecepted. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #19

"Prove that the calls were not interecepted" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #20

Which explains all those massive data collection centers right? Savannahmann Jun 2013 #21

I'm trying to understand your point Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #23

There is an escape Savannahmann Jun 2013 #25

Intercepted? That's a different thing than MineralMan Jun 2013 #15

If you equate getting phone meta data as something similar to the interception of calls then grantcart Jun 2013 #22

and I will repeat this nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #24

"some of us get it, some of us don't" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #26

and some people think that an apple is somehow related to a pineapple. grantcart Jun 2013 #30

Well, I got a problem with this nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #32

Yes I agree, but it's important not to misrepresent what went on with the Verizon case Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #34

and as usual, you don't sad-cafe Jun 2013 #33

Just let us know what kind of cookie you want Dreamer Tatum Jun 2013 #27

nadinbrzezinski: ON IT. Brickbat Jun 2013 #29

Stop that! Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #31

love it sad-cafe Jun 2013 #35