Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
21. Which explains all those massive data collection centers right?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:01 PM
Jun 2013

Come on, get serious for a minute will you? Here's the link again in case you didn't bother clicking it.

A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy.


Emphasis mine on the bold domestic. Come on man, get serious. Do you think they would build a two billion dollar facility, one of many such two billion dollar facilities just to know who we called without knowing what we said?

They said that the images from the buck naked scanners would not be kept, then they insisted that technology be included to rapidly transfer the images to a database. They said that they wouldn't do a lot of things, then later admit they were, but for our own protection.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There are plenty of people here who are OK with Stasi type surveillance. hobbit709 Jun 2013 #1
Neither am I. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #2
The only way I am OK with it is because hollysmom Jun 2013 #3
That's more reason for it to be a horribly bad thing. Myrina Jun 2013 #5
my preference as well hollysmom Jun 2013 #8
The Sequester forced them to cut back on engineers to monitor the data anyways. randome Jun 2013 #9
Did you leap from metadata provided by Verizon to 'call interception'? randome Jun 2013 #4
You never fail to inject yourself into a story Floyd_Gondolli Jun 2013 #6
Unrec. What call interceptions? FSogol Jun 2013 #7
I guess you missed the program with Verizon nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #10
Missed the program? Yeah, the US media blows, but I guess that's something you DO know about. FSogol Jun 2013 #12
I guess some of us get it, some of us don't nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #16
I think you're confused about what intercepting means Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #13
Thank you maddezmom Jun 2013 #14
Stop already with the facts! HappyMe Jun 2013 #28
No calls were "intercepted". This wasn't wiretapping Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #11
Yeah, and we can believe them Savannahmann Jun 2013 #17
So this instance of Verizon record collection was infact warrantless wiretapping of calls? Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #18
Prove that the calls were not interecepted. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #19
"Prove that the calls were not interecepted" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #20
Which explains all those massive data collection centers right? Savannahmann Jun 2013 #21
I'm trying to understand your point Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #23
There is an escape Savannahmann Jun 2013 #25
Intercepted? That's a different thing than MineralMan Jun 2013 #15
If you equate getting phone meta data as something similar to the interception of calls then grantcart Jun 2013 #22
and I will repeat this nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #24
"some of us get it, some of us don't" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #26
and some people think that an apple is somehow related to a pineapple. grantcart Jun 2013 #30
Well, I got a problem with this nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #32
Yes I agree, but it's important not to misrepresent what went on with the Verizon case Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #34
and as usual, you don't sad-cafe Jun 2013 #33
Just let us know what kind of cookie you want Dreamer Tatum Jun 2013 #27
nadinbrzezinski: ON IT. Brickbat Jun 2013 #29
Stop that! Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #31
love it sad-cafe Jun 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»And as usual, when I wrot...»Reply #21