Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: And as usual, when I wrote I knew calls were intercepted [View all]Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)21. Which explains all those massive data collection centers right?
Come on, get serious for a minute will you? Here's the link again in case you didn't bother clicking it.
A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the worlds communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trailsparking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital pocket litter. It is, in some measure, the realization of the total information awareness program created during the first term of the Bush administrationan effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans privacy.
Emphasis mine on the bold domestic. Come on man, get serious. Do you think they would build a two billion dollar facility, one of many such two billion dollar facilities just to know who we called without knowing what we said?
They said that the images from the buck naked scanners would not be kept, then they insisted that technology be included to rapidly transfer the images to a database. They said that they wouldn't do a lot of things, then later admit they were, but for our own protection.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Missed the program? Yeah, the US media blows, but I guess that's something you DO know about.
FSogol
Jun 2013
#12
So this instance of Verizon record collection was infact warrantless wiretapping of calls?
Cali_Democrat
Jun 2013
#18
If you equate getting phone meta data as something similar to the interception of calls then
grantcart
Jun 2013
#22
Yes I agree, but it's important not to misrepresent what went on with the Verizon case
Cali_Democrat
Jun 2013
#34