Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

sad-cafe

(1,277 posts)

35. love it

Reply to Brickbat (Reply #29)

Thu Jun 6, 2013, 05:54 PM

Jun 2013

too good

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

And as usual, when I wrote I knew calls were intercepted [View all] nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 OP

There are plenty of people here who are OK with Stasi type surveillance. hobbit709 Jun 2013 #1

Neither am I. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #2

The only way I am OK with it is because hollysmom Jun 2013 #3

That's more reason for it to be a horribly bad thing. Myrina Jun 2013 #5

my preference as well hollysmom Jun 2013 #8

The Sequester forced them to cut back on engineers to monitor the data anyways. randome Jun 2013 #9

Did you leap from metadata provided by Verizon to 'call interception'? randome Jun 2013 #4

You never fail to inject yourself into a story Floyd_Gondolli Jun 2013 #6

Unrec. What call interceptions? FSogol Jun 2013 #7

I guess you missed the program with Verizon nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #10

Missed the program? Yeah, the US media blows, but I guess that's something you DO know about. FSogol Jun 2013 #12

I guess some of us get it, some of us don't nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #16

I think you're confused about what intercepting means Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #13

Thank you maddezmom Jun 2013 #14

Stop already with the facts! HappyMe Jun 2013 #28

No calls were "intercepted". This wasn't wiretapping Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #11

Yeah, and we can believe them Savannahmann Jun 2013 #17

So this instance of Verizon record collection was infact warrantless wiretapping of calls? Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #18

Prove that the calls were not interecepted. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #19

"Prove that the calls were not interecepted" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #20

Which explains all those massive data collection centers right? Savannahmann Jun 2013 #21

I'm trying to understand your point Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #23

There is an escape Savannahmann Jun 2013 #25

Intercepted? That's a different thing than MineralMan Jun 2013 #15

If you equate getting phone meta data as something similar to the interception of calls then grantcart Jun 2013 #22

and I will repeat this nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #24

"some of us get it, some of us don't" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #26

and some people think that an apple is somehow related to a pineapple. grantcart Jun 2013 #30

Well, I got a problem with this nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #32

Yes I agree, but it's important not to misrepresent what went on with the Verizon case Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #34

and as usual, you don't sad-cafe Jun 2013 #33

Just let us know what kind of cookie you want Dreamer Tatum Jun 2013 #27

nadinbrzezinski: ON IT. Brickbat Jun 2013 #29

Stop that! Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #31

love it sad-cafe Jun 2013 #35