Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Santorum: Women Are Capable Of ‘Flying Small Planes’ [View all]
Santorum: Women Are Capable Of Flying Small Planes
By Eli Clifton
The Pentagon announcement easing the ban on women serving in combat led Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum to express his concerns that missions could be put in jeopardy because of other types of emotions that are involved.
But today, Santorum attempted to clarify his seemingly sexist statement in an interview with ABC News:
Watch it:
<...>
Having put to rest the allegation that he was suggesting women were emotionally unfit to serve in combat and instead having argued that men are emotionally unfit to serve alongside women Santorum went on to emphasize that he has no problem putting womens lives in danger.
<...>
In the past 24 hours, Santorum: accused Obama of helping Iran acquire nuclear weapons; suggested that male soldiers are incapable of controlling their emotions around female comrades in combat; and said women are better suited to flying small planes.
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/02/10/423325/santorum-women-small-planes/
By Eli Clifton
The Pentagon announcement easing the ban on women serving in combat led Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum to express his concerns that missions could be put in jeopardy because of other types of emotions that are involved.
But today, Santorum attempted to clarify his seemingly sexist statement in an interview with ABC News:
RICK SANTORUM: I was talking about mens emotional issues, not women. Thats something Ive talked about repeatedly. [...] Men in our culture are focused on if a woman is in trouble, obviously, to react to try to help to protect and care for that person. That is something that is built in culturally. So my concern is that being in combat in that situation, instead of being focused on the mission, they might be more concerned about protecting a woman in a vulnerable position.
Watch it:
<...>
Having put to rest the allegation that he was suggesting women were emotionally unfit to serve in combat and instead having argued that men are emotionally unfit to serve alongside women Santorum went on to emphasize that he has no problem putting womens lives in danger.
<...>
In the past 24 hours, Santorum: accused Obama of helping Iran acquire nuclear weapons; suggested that male soldiers are incapable of controlling their emotions around female comrades in combat; and said women are better suited to flying small planes.
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/02/10/423325/santorum-women-small-planes/
Don't forget the "guillotine!"

94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OH....I thought so! I could tell from the yellow stripe down his back...of course. thanks.
CTyankee
Feb 2012
#49
plus google. I am glad he's acting like this. If it pisses you off then you know what womankind has
roguevalley
Feb 2012
#32
I thought all military "guys" are buds and come to each other's aid when in trouble.
Honeycombe8
Feb 2012
#15
Stupid positions require even stupider rationales...somestime multiple stupid ones.
Old and In the Way
Feb 2012
#17
Ricky,"I was talking about men’s emotional issues, not women." Of course you were. No one
yellowcanine
Feb 2012
#19
So the all female flight crews of my latest flight on a 747 should be grounded?
riderinthestorm
Feb 2012
#20
Well, he'll squirm out of that one by saying that she lost her legs technically in a helicopter
riderinthestorm
Feb 2012
#65
Except of course for his rapture ready idiot supporters who do want to go back to 1930
riderinthestorm
Feb 2012
#24
It's not a campaign ender because the average Republican is even more dimwitted than he is
Katashi_itto
Feb 2012
#44
Hell, I thought "Blah People" would have been a campaign ender--but Republicans don't care.
TwilightGardener
Feb 2012
#64
beautiful. That picture of four looks like my aunts walking together. They could do anything.
roguevalley
Feb 2012
#34
I hate to point out the obvious, but aren't women unofficially fighting in combat?
justiceischeap
Feb 2012
#27
Please, please, please nominate this useless clusterfuck of an imbecilic goober.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2012
#42
You'll need a link for tha statement please. AFAIC, most combat roles are closed to Israeli women
riderinthestorm
Feb 2012
#63
I do sort of like the logical conclusion where nobody anywhere's fit to serve in the military.. (nt)
Posteritatis
Feb 2012
#59
Small planes, yes--because the big ones are too hard for the ladies to steer or back up in.
TwilightGardener
Feb 2012
#60
There were volunteer Russian female ground combat units in WWI who fought in the trenches
aint_no_life_nowhere
Feb 2012
#94
Isn't that the same thing that Bush scared up with about AlQaeda? - crop dusters
underpants
Feb 2012
#68
And the F-16, the fighter that women have been flying in combat operations for years
pinboy3niner
Feb 2012
#70
HAW HAW...I taught a young small girl to fly small planes 20 years ago. Now she is a 767 captain.
Skwid
Feb 2012
#72