Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LWolf

(46,179 posts)

17. Because it didn't stop.

Reply to Bodhi BloodWave (Reply #16)

Fri Jun 7, 2013, 12:52 PM

Jun 2013

The Obama administration was quite clear about not holding the Bush administration accountable for crimes. If the buck was going to stop with GWB, Pelosi should have allowed impeachment on the table while he was in office. Or the Obama administration should have pursued criminal charges after he wasn't.

Instead, the Obama administration continued the crime, instead of putting an end to it.

Obama himself allowed that buck to bypass GWB and land in his own lap.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's not Obama's fault if people haven't paid attention [View all] struggle4progress Jun 2013 OP

Exactly. blm Jun 2013 #1

True Enough, Sir The Magistrate Jun 2013 #2

New words we'd like to see in the dictionary: Zorra Jun 2013 #3

You know not everyone is so easily fooled treestar Jun 2013 #7

Well, some of us see more and more of our rights repeatedly being restricted or taken away as Zorra Jun 2013 #12

That does not make every single trumped up treestar Jun 2013 #20

So here's what I'm seein: I took th'time t'write a thoughtful post, struggle4progress Jun 2013 #10

Too bad LWolf Jun 2013 #14

The buck might stop with Obama, but why do so many of you seem to ignore that it might stop earlier? Bodhi BloodWave Jun 2013 #16

Because it didn't stop. LWolf Jun 2013 #17

This is a very flippant response siligut Jun 2013 #18

+1 LWolf Jun 2013 #13

Yeah but isn't he just the handsomest President we've ever had? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #15

Acting within the dubious law cannot be conflated with compelled by the law as a deflection tactic TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #4

If you don't like the effin FISA courts or the thinking that's behind Maryland v Smith, struggle4progress Jun 2013 #9

There is also the issue of whether there are criminal prosecutions treestar Jun 2013 #5

Obama wasn't in charge of anything when he was 18 or 19 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 #6

Bush disidoro01 Jun 2013 #8

no, but almost every liberal and progressive was outraged about the degree of the surveillance state Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #11

I think that you described to a T what has angered progressives. Beacool Jun 2013 #19