General Discussion

randome

(34,845 posts)

16. The government needs to keep its hands off my Precious Bodily Numbers!

Reply to uponit7771 (Original post)

Fri Jun 7, 2013, 05:40 PM

Jun 2013

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can the Meta Data scandal be filed in the "Another Sloppy M$M Story" file yet? [View all] uponit7771 Jun 2013 OP

Should be... gcomeau Jun 2013 #1

2006? Try 1979 jberryhill Jun 2013 #2

thx!!! uponit7771 Jun 2013 #3

Try before 1979 Iliyah Jun 2013 #46

I'm been saying since this shit started its bullshit madokie Jun 2013 #4

+1 uponit7771 Jun 2013 #5

Not saying I approve of the NSA, but you're right. Another 'scandal' has done it's job........... wandy Jun 2013 #6

Thats the sad part too madokie Jun 2013 #10

And this is just the 2014 warmup........... wandy Jun 2013 #12

I wish I could share the visual I got with that. LOL madokie Jun 2013 #13

Just wait till you get to watch Karl Rove try to give birth to Jeb Bush................. wandy Jun 2013 #17

Wooo madokie Jun 2013 #20

The second I saw the M$M jump on the story I thought "more sloppy" the do no research uponit7771 Jun 2013 #22

They've been doing tracking Jamaal510 Jun 2013 #7

"What did people think the Patriot Act authorized?! Bake sales?!" Silent3 Jun 2013 #8

Nope. Union Scribe Jun 2013 #9

Yeah, and you have to resort to calling those who disagree with you "Bieber" supporters.. Cha Jun 2013 #14

... Union Scribe Jun 2013 #58

Damn Straight I support the President. Cha Jun 2013 #59

If you really loved him Union Scribe Jun 2013 #62

umm.. i guess you don't know what a metaphor is boilerbabe Jun 2013 #61

+100000 This one will be incessantly propagandized woo me with science Jun 2013 #24

Why are you so certain that the document wasn't altered? pnwmom Jun 2013 #42

You can certainly cling to that hope. Union Scribe Jun 2013 #63

How do you explain the differences between the WA post document pnwmom Jun 2013 #66

You think a forger sent out two different documents? Union Scribe Jun 2013 #67

So you're accepting claims based on an article you haven't even read? n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #68

Absolutely not. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #11

Link for that.. And, I don't mean some shit from Glenn Greenwald.. Cha Jun 2013 #18

Answer the question DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #21

YES!! As long as it has the checks and balanced described in the USSC circa 1979 when they decided.. uponit7771 Jun 2013 #26

Thank ou for the direct answer DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #33

And, I don't give a shit what you think of those who disagree with you. Cha Jun 2013 #30

But do you have what it takes to answer the thrice-asked question? DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #34

Yeah, you just keep asking that. Cha Jun 2013 #37

And you can just keep being afraid that you support domestic surveillance DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #40

but you would be ok with an ANDREW SULLIVAN LINK boilerbabe Jun 2013 #28

Your ignorance is on display again. Cha Jun 2013 #31

LOL, did I miss something? Iliyah Jun 2013 #49

No, the poster keeps bringing up Cha Jun 2013 #53

Yes it is, greenwald...that in and of itself says a lot uponit7771 Jun 2013 #23

Or it's a hoax using an altered document. pnwmom Jun 2013 #43

The White House doesn't react the way it has for altered documents DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #45

I think it's reacted appropriately. n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #47

I don't, but that isn't what we are discussing DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #48

No, it didn't admit that the document was valid. pnwmom Jun 2013 #55

And the fact that WaPo amended their story, sheshe2 Jun 2013 #60

The OP is about the meta data, ie Verizon, leak muriel_volestrangler Jun 2013 #56

Why does this need to categorized as a scandal. How about merely some more sunlight into the doings Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #15

The sunlight has been shed on this subject 3 times already, this time its a winger who is reporting uponit7771 Jun 2013 #27

Actually. It is a leak of a top secret document. There is no arguing that. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #35

...and the document stated what we've already know since 2006 and been reported on 3 times already uponit7771 Jun 2013 #38

Indeed. Could I see that 2006 information? Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #51

There is plenty to dispute on that. How do you know that it's a real document? pnwmom Jun 2013 #44

The government needs to keep its hands off my Precious Bodily Numbers! randome Jun 2013 #16

I do not avoid women, Mandrake, but I do deny them my essence. FarCenter Jun 2013 #25

Yup but it hooked a few fish so they'll do it again. gulliver Jun 2013 #19

lol...yeap, sounds like the big lie performance Herman Goering spelled out uponit7771 Jun 2013 #29

The Patriot Act Authorized "going after terrorists", which no doubt is why it's been Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #32

Yeap, I'll be working hard for 2014 change of congress into liberal hands uponit7771 Jun 2013 #36

So will I. But these policies are unacceptable and many of them are driven from the Executive Branch Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #39

Agreed. Iliyah Jun 2013 #52

and for a president Niceguy1 Jun 2013 #41

Right there with ya! Iliyah Jun 2013 #50

And what would you suggest we do with the PRISM story? Hmmm? Th1onein Jun 2013 #54

THIS JUST IN!!!! OJ HAS BEEN ACQUITTED Uzair Jun 2013 #57

+1 uponit7771 Jun 2013 #65

But...but...Obama = Bush!!! CakeGrrl Jun 2013 #64