Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Most Dishonest Words in American Politics: 'Right to Work' [View all]
http://www.alternet.org/labor/right-work-unions-collective-bargaining
''Right to work is the most dishonest phrase in American political discourse. It sounds like its defending peoples right to earn a living. But as used by its supporters, it means making it impossible for workers to form an effective union, couched in the language of freedom and choice.
Specifically, it means laws banning union shops, in which everyone in a workplace has to join the union or pay a fee to cover the cost of union representation. Twenty-four states have such laws. All were in the South and West until last year, when Indiana and Michigan enacted them. Michigans law was rammed through the Republican-dominated legislature in a lame-duck session last December.
The Michigan law was pretty devastating for the labor movement, says Erin Johansson of American Rights at Work. It came in the state where the United Auto Workers six-week occupation of General Motors plants in Flint in 1937 won the victory that opened the doors for unions throughout American industry, the state whose union labor defined the working-class prosperity of World War II to the 1970s.
Both Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder and Dick DeVos, the heir to the multibillion-dollar Amway fortune who bankrolled the campaign for the law, stuck to the party line about freedom. Snyder said the law would give workers the freedom to choose and unions an opportunity to be more responsible to their workers, because instead of automatically collecting dues, theyd have to show workers a value proposition.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I didn't bother to research the policies of all 50 states if thats what you are asking.
Travis_0004
Jun 2013
#59
The idea is to harass and intimidate the employee so much that they give up and quit.
Skeeter Barnes
Jun 2013
#61
Florida is a "right to work" state. Teachers who are anti-union just reap all the benefits without
Riley18
Jun 2013
#30
Unfortunately a lot of people in non-union shops don't understand they're standing on...
Gidney N Cloyd
Jun 2013
#10
They are already being helped by a union. The fact that an employer doesn't want to deal with an
byeya
Jun 2013
#17
Some are, certainly. But I also think there's a lot of naiveté, a lot of people who...
Gidney N Cloyd
Jun 2013
#31
Right to starve to death in a fucking dog-eat-dog world is what it really means.
1-Old-Man
Jun 2013
#19
It is because the history of labor has been systematically removed from our schools
senseandsensibility
Jun 2013
#22
Fits right in with the venacular that gave us the "Clear Skies Initiative" amongst other things...
cascadiance
Jun 2013
#28
Why should someone pay dues to a union they find corrupt, ineffectual or racist?
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Jun 2013
#54
If he's paying dues, the Union is obligated to do what they can for him.
Skeeter Barnes
Jun 2013
#62