Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama's "Spy on Everyone" policy was already public? My *ass*, it was. [View all]MisterP
(23,730 posts)142. it's like that New Outer Limits episode where the doctors are hooked into a woman's mind as it
collapses in on itself: anyone objecting to behavior way beyond anything Nixon did is now a GOP dupe, even Gore becomes a phony, and they defend the very program which they attack the GOP for introducing, because they say they're afraid that opposition to the policy will let the GOP win and they'll continue that same policy
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
187 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama's "Spy on Everyone" policy was already public? My *ass*, it was. [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Jun 2013
OP
a vocal MINORITY on here used to argue it was technically imposible, but since yesterday they have
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jun 2013
#2
actually, I should have said some, as they really are just a vocal MINORITY here.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jun 2013
#12
Yes they are a minority, but even that few who claim to be democrats, and I do not doubt it, is far
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#22
yes, you are absolutely correct, and you are also right to voice it at the type of your lungs
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jun 2013
#23
And they think no one notices. Ignore them from now on. We have work to do and we need to start
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#25
Frontline did a two hour special on the specifics of how they do the "vacuum" years ago.
xtraxritical
Jun 2013
#126
When did Obama specifically say he would end the NSA collection of phone records?
Cali_Democrat
Jun 2013
#177
It's not, and it's much too intrusive at this point. If the NSA had a specific foreign
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#159
Agreed. I think it's well past time to look at everything in the Patriot Act and
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#162
You don't blame President Obama for using the tools at his disposal? What if you called
A Simple Game
Jun 2013
#184
The fact that you limit the scope of your comments to meta data is very telling to me.
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#107
Well, if they have done nothing wrong, they have nothing to worry about, right? Do you view elected
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#28
I could easily see Congress ensuring that the data is never used for anything...
randome
Jun 2013
#153
Just by-the-by, Richard NIxon had the same controls. Didn't stop him at all. n/t
jtuck004
Jun 2013
#137
I don't think he had a panel of judges, two Congressional subcommittees and a signing judge, did he?
randome
Jun 2013
#149
As Nixon said, "If the President does it, it can't be illegal" or somthing along those lines...
jtuck004
Jun 2013
#161
It was leaked to the press during the Bush years and it was a SCANDAL at that time. WE, Democrats
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#29
True, I wasn't really clear on that. FISA was in place and was modified to protect Bush and the
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#87
Yes but "nobody's listening to your phone calls" except Verizon, AT&T...
Corruption Inc
Jun 2013
#19
Yes not because Bush was better but because Obama was suppose to be different
newmember
Jun 2013
#33
So ending the Iraq War, Don't Ask Don't Tell, and the Pre-existing Condition Exclusion don't count?
SunSeeker
Jun 2013
#36
13 Counties in FL have set up a such a system - iWATCH program (report your neighbors and friends!)
Melinda
Jun 2013
#66
There was a leak involved, but the program has been reported on several times. n/t
Bolo Boffin
Jun 2013
#40
Since when did spying on the entire country have anything to do with 'protecting national security'?
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#78
Again, explain to me how the NSA knowing who is calling who in this country is going to stop terror.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#93
Wrong, Bush broke the law, yes, but then Congress adjusted that law, retroactively, so now he
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#129
No, you couldn't be more wrong. The law was adjusted making what Bush did legal. Just as that
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#138
I appreciate that you are willing to discuss it and you are asking good questions.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#136
Yeah, because opposing "spy on everyone" is the same as saying nothing can be classified.
Marr
Jun 2013
#92
Good for Obama that this Big Brother stuff came out after the election.
NoodleyAppendage
Jun 2013
#85
again, i knew the NSA was collecting all our phone metdata in 2006, didn't you?
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#118
I did not know about PRISM but admit, like you, to suspecting it. I presumed the phone data
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#122
I don't have near the problem with PRISM that I do with the phone data mining.
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#124
EFF is stating the gov't is asking for more time for other surveillance cases now
suffragette
Jun 2013
#100
it's like that New Outer Limits episode where the doctors are hooked into a woman's mind as it
MisterP
Jun 2013
#142
SENATOR Obama co-sponsored a bill that would outlaw any warrants without specific probable cause
BlueStreak
Jun 2013
#156
Nothing presented here by the apologists excuses it or mitigates how disgusting it is.
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#186