Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama's NSA Defense: Says Congress Can Raise Objections, BUT it Can't as a Whole! [View all]Autumn
(48,965 posts)1. Interesting. I had thought Congress was part of the oversight.
rec
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama's NSA Defense: Says Congress Can Raise Objections, BUT it Can't as a Whole! [View all]
KoKo
Jun 2013
OP
So lock the doors and post guards and have Congress talk to the President in private.
randome
Jun 2013
#2
Your just not getting this. If you "lock the doors" and dont let anyone in the public know what
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#21
They couldn't speak up? Horse-shizz! They all enjoy an amazing Constitutional protection:
struggle4progress
Jun 2013
#4
The article explains WHY.. It's the Intelligence Commitees that are Sworn to Secrecy.
KoKo
Jun 2013
#8
You need to read the Constitution again: no Representative or Senator can be prosecuted
struggle4progress
Jun 2013
#23
According to Article 1, Section 6, they are immune from prosecution if they bring it to the floor
FarCenter
Jun 2013
#5
See the semicolon after "same" - the immunity for speeches and debate is absolute.
FarCenter
Jun 2013
#12
Show me a case where a Senator had been charge with treason for something said on the floor.
FarCenter
Jun 2013
#16
Find a Senator or MOC on the Intelligence Committee willing to get prosecuted for treason.
OrwellwasRight
Jun 2013
#26
The court squarely addressed the issue you raised upthread, namely, the question
struggle4progress
Jun 2013
#35
Whether or not s/he would be prosecuted for comments made on the House/Senate floor,
OrwellwasRight
Jun 2013
#34
There's not One of them with Courage to do that, though. They answer to their Masters...
KoKo
Jun 2013
#11
There is plenty of blame to go around but the main blame goes to the one who did it. nt
limpyhobbler
Jun 2013
#18
Obama's operating within the law. If ya don't like the law, work to change it
struggle4progress
Jun 2013
#30
He's operating within a law HE helped to pass. Something that came close to losing him the election.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#37
The bill was a compromise during the Bush era, intended to end Bush's lawless behavior,
struggle4progress
Jun 2013
#39
Oh, enough of this BS. It was a bill quickly cobbled together to save the Bush administration from
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#41
We agree on several points: (1) Bush's behavior was lawless; (2) The telecoms cooperation with BUsh
struggle4progress
Jun 2013
#42