General Discussion

Neue Regel

(221 posts)

10. meh...I've been unpopular before

Sat Feb 11, 2012, 05:42 AM

Feb 2012

Generall speaking, in any large group if one does not parrot established truthisms, large numbers of people get upset at you because you're rocking the boat. Why can't everyone just go along to get along? Don't shake up the status quo!

I have to say, though, that it stands to reason if the earth has been warming as much as we have been told wouldn't we see some ice loss in this region? Even just a little?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Himalayas and nearby peaks have lost no ice in past 10 years, study shows [View all] Neue Regel Feb 2012 OP

Not again. demosincebirth Feb 2012 #1

Not again - what? RC Feb 2012 #2

I think the poster means the climate models were wrong, again Neue Regel Feb 2012 #5

Oh. Now I get it. renie408 Feb 2012 #8

Thanks bongbong Feb 2012 #3

The headline was copied and pasted from the Guardian. How is it misleading? Neue Regel Feb 2012 #4

????? bongbong Feb 2012 #17

Ok. renie408 Feb 2012 #6

This post will earn you NO popularity points. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #7

It took me a minute to figure out why fiber count was important to this thread. renie408 Feb 2012 #9

meh...I've been unpopular before Neue Regel Feb 2012 #10

And the ice loss everywhere else is because...?? renie408 Feb 2012 #11

No edhopper Feb 2012 #15

"n any large group if one does not parrot established truthisms" obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #16

"parrot established truthisms" trumad Feb 2012 #18

If you were to study the computer models you would understand that places on earth Bandit Feb 2012 #20

Can ice be lost twice? Electric Monk Feb 2012 #12

How does this feed into 'No global warming'? RC Feb 2012 #13

It's actually called edhopper Feb 2012 #14

Dude--- trumad Feb 2012 #19