The Himalayas and nearby peaks have lost no ice in past 10 years, study shows

[renie408]

11. And the ice loss everywhere else is because...??

No, don't answer that. Just forget that.

I think you think that you are unpopular because you are this lone voice of reason trying to swim against a tide of brainwashed zombies washing downstream. I am really mixing my nautical metaphors there, but you get the idea. I don't think this post is complete bullshit because everybody else thinks it is complete bullshit. I think it is complete bullshit because the fact that the ice is still the same thickness now on the top of the highest mountain peaks in the world as it was ten years ago does ZERO to refute global warming. How about the ice just a little bit further down? Is it just as thick as ten years ago? Where does the ice level change? Has that line been gradually moving up the mountains implying that given enough time, there WILL be a change in the ice at the top of the Himalayas?

I believe in global warming because the globe is getting warmer. That seems pretty straight forward to me. Now, I know that in your head I just joined the ranks of the brainwashed zombies. And that's whatever.