Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So all that hysteria yesterday [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)173. So we allow our government to gather massive data on each of us that they promise not
to use except if they need to. This is only as good as your trust of your government. It is a tool that can easily be misused against citizens that the government decides are threats. Like whistle-blowers, leakers and protestors.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
184 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And that they have to get judicial approval just as they would in any crime case.
pnwmom
Jun 2013
#29
Judicial review that proves blanket authority to surveil isnt oversight. The idea of judicial
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#149
that was the court order to store all the information. The info doesn't even include names. It's the
okaawhatever
Jun 2013
#171
So we allow our government to gather massive data on each of us that they promise not
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#173
I'm okay with that. I would rather the gov't keep it than the phone companies. They have a better
okaawhatever
Jun 2013
#174
If the govment has it so do the phone companies. Corporations run the govment. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#182
The tech guys say there is a way to do this so that the Govt gets the info without going to the
dkf
Jun 2013
#42
But will unwarranted info stand in a court of law? Even the tech companies would sue the Fed
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#50
What other non-tinfoil hat reason could there be? We know they're using it to convict people
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#64
Can you explain to me the damage that can be done? Possibly include links to instances?
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#156
SCOTUS ruled on parts of this. There have also been court cases that went to Fed appeals court. nt
okaawhatever
Jun 2013
#175
How's about this...it would be nice if they would drop the secrets privilege and let the 2 cases
dkf
Jun 2013
#176
I think opening up secret cases is a slippery slope, but I do want scotus or the legislature to give
okaawhatever
Jun 2013
#177
Super. Which parts of it are untrue, and where's the documentation for that?
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2013
#33
No, the FISA Court Order expressly said all data from all users. If that is representative, the
leveymg
Jun 2013
#158
Did Verison's political donations enter into their selection? Why spy on only 66% of phone conversa
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#146
I must have missed that. Can you give me a link? I am not doubting just like to
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#161
We don't worship Obama. We just aren't stupid enough to fall for the ratfucking hyped-up "scandals"
KittyWampus
Jun 2013
#34
Though you fall for every single "official" explanation of unacceptable policy...
villager
Jun 2013
#55
Though you fall for every single "Conspiracy Theory" from our notorious right wing corporate
sheshe2
Jun 2013
#92
If you dont ever question his decisions and adamantly defend them to a fault, you can see
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#162
U bring up a good point. This was leaked in 2006, wouldn't surprise me if its still the same person.
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#12
I don't know if I'd call it spin, they seem to be bringing more facts than hyperbole with them.
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#24
I agree, the article agrees to. It's just referring to the hair on fire stuff.
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#66
The problem here is that pesky word "spying". THe govment isnt "spying" they are just collecting
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#163
Greenwald routinely refers to supporters of the president as "cultists". I hate to tell you how I..
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#136
Doesnt that apply to all that dare challenge the president? How do you know what his "agenda" is?nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#160
I believe that Hillary Clinton said much the same about trusting Bush. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#170
Don't worry, they'll dig something up. They can always go back to the motherload:
freshwest
Jun 2013
#114
This real scandal is not going away until our gov abandons it's Stasi policies.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jun 2013
#57
It's the "FOX-i-fication" of the news, and Greenwald is perfect for it. Is there any wonder....
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#79
As Bill Maher said, Reagan began the process of just 'making shit up.' The media has that script...
freshwest
Jun 2013
#122
You're right. Sadly, the telecommunications act allowed for the fusion of news & entertainment.
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#130
exactly! kooks and cranks like Al Gore have been exposed as the crazies that they are
Douglas Carpenter
Jun 2013
#99
Al Gore calls Obama administration’s collection of phone records ‘obscenely outrageous’
Douglas Carpenter
Jun 2013
#150
That court order is only to store the info. Not access individual numbers. In other countries the
okaawhatever
Jun 2013
#172
You do realize they have government owned equipment duplicating 50+ companies data?
dkf
Jun 2013
#111
That's even worse, that they have all this access and still can't prevent things...
dkf
Jun 2013
#117
How would it harm you if everyday a stranger walked a circle around your house snapping
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#141
Yup. another day another smear another Darrell Isaa yawner. Yet they persist.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#166