Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
20. what was the context that led to the creation of the NSA?
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 01:58 PM
Jun 2013

Last edited Sun Jun 9, 2013, 05:10 PM - Edit history (1)

After WWII, the U.S. brought Nazis into the U.S. under a program, via the OSS, the intelligence agency began at that time, called Operation Paperclip.

Truman insisted that Operation Paperclip be limited to those German scientists who were not associated with the Nazis. So, the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency created fake biographies and employment histories for those scientists, in order to allow them to work in the U.S. with security clearance.

So, from the beginning, the intel "oversight" engaged in lies to do whatever they wanted because their objective was to keep information away from the USSR...even tho the USSR had been our allies in WWII and had, in fact, WON the war on the eastern front in Europe.

The U.S. moved from hating Nazis to hating commies - because, not only did Operation Paperclip bring Nazi scientists into the U.S., it also helped to hide Nazi party bigwigs in the U.S. and in South America.

And these Nazis shaped American foreign policy and fueled McCarthyism.

One of them was Klaus Barbie, called "The Butcher of Lyon," because he personally tortured prisoners.

KLAUS BARBIE WAS RECRUITED by the U.S. intel services at the time because of his anti-Marxist credentials.

Yes, the U.S. govt. moved from support for the Marxists fighting against the Nazis in Western Europe to support for Nazis in the new cold war, that again placed the U.S. to the far right, most especially in comparison to any other western democracy. But this pro-Nazi intel apparatus did align U.S. policy with the businessmen's crusade against socialist reform in the early 20th century (thos same businessmen who plotted to assassinate FDR for his New Deal policies.) Those same businessmen were supporters of fascism until it wasn't good business to admit this.

So, if you want to know about the history of the U.S. in the mid to late 20th century, you have to realize that Nazi-sympathizing intel agencies and their govt. mouthpieces made sure fascism was well supported in the U.S. (but here it's called "freedom.&quot

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, actually Truman signed the order creating the CIA villager Jun 2013 #1
Yes, that is true. kentuck Jun 2013 #2
Truman regretted it... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #5
Well, those regrets do little us for us now, with the MIC firmly in place. villager Jun 2013 #9
The whole mess is so institutionalized that there's little chance to change it... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #10
Dramatic change of policies indeed.... villager Jun 2013 #16
Fuck agent Mike... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2013 #75
Democratic majorities in both houses and a Democratic President is the only way xtraxritical Jun 2013 #96
what was the context that led to the creation of the NSA? RainDog Jun 2013 #20
Always good to remind folks of Operation Paperclip villager Jun 2013 #25
I repeated a joke to a friend to describe the CIA. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #24
part of the reason he did that DonCoquixote Jun 2013 #31
Kick and REC!! Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #3
+1000 dkf Jun 2013 #4
I agree with you. Needs fixing. I also feel it would be good to have all the facts. emulatorloo Jun 2013 #6
Another reason why we need to nominate and elect Elizabeth Warren in 2016. nt Zorra Jun 2013 #7
I agree Yo_Mama Jun 2013 #8
Franklin said "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure"and was talking about preventing 9-11 graham4anything Jun 2013 #11
Yes, Benjamin Franklin was talking about government spying and terrorists in jet airplanes. Marr Jun 2013 #15
Your position is that Smirk and Sneer are blameless for 9/11 because they didn't have the tools Fumesucker Jun 2013 #35
preventing 9-11 from happening again. Seems the #characters got cut off on the cut/paste graham4anything Jun 2013 #37
Absolute, unadulterated nonsense. theaocp Jun 2013 #59
Every single gun could be removed from the street, except for the NRA's interference. graham4anything Jun 2013 #60
We had enough security in place to prevent the attacks on the WTC. But for some reason they didnt rhett o rick Jun 2013 #80
The constittuion is a living breathing thing. Which means it is not set in stone. graham4anything Jun 2013 #81
I dont want anymore of Obama thank you. I want a true Democrat that wants to support rhett o rick Jun 2013 #82
Same old name calling and Ron Paul soundbytes.At least we can all agree on reintrpreting the 2nd. graham4anything Jun 2013 #85
Unlike yourself I am against all of Bush's policies that stomped on our Constitution. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #87
same soundbytes as the libertarians. Me, I want an 80-20 and have legislature pass like it did graham4anything Jun 2013 #88
And there it is. progressoid Jun 2013 #89
It is the same talking points Rand Paul/Ron Paul uses, the same Nader used. graham4anything Jun 2013 #90
And now Nader too! progressoid Jun 2013 #91
This message was self-deleted by its author graham4anything Jun 2013 #92
Security did a bang up job in Boston. nt awoke_in_2003 Jun 2013 #76
an event that 2 thrillkill fame seekers did,who planned on July 4 so they didn't even know the date graham4anything Jun 2013 #77
Fixing the CIA and their like has been tried. meanit Jun 2013 #12
Even Carter tried - +1 for Carter byeya Jun 2013 #14
...and we saw how that wound up. nt. villager Jun 2013 #33
Yup. roamer65 Jun 2013 #51
Unfortunately... 99Forever Jun 2013 #13
That is why he is going to have to make a choice with whom he stands on this issue? kentuck Jun 2013 #17
And a Senate. Fuddnik Jun 2013 #69
Not with a Republican Congress treestar Jun 2013 #18
Well, ProSense Jun 2013 #19
And if he doesn't find a way to help us (the people) fix it... kentuck Jun 2013 #22
oh, for fuck's sake RainDog Jun 2013 #32
What are the "actual concerns"? kentuck Jun 2013 #34
actual concerns are in your OP RainDog Jun 2013 #36
Oh sorry. kentuck Jun 2013 #38
that's what they do for a living Skittles Jun 2013 #62
Upton Sinclair said it best. OnyxCollie Jun 2013 #45
Well said. kentuck Jun 2013 #48
There is no, A Simple Game Jun 2013 #68
Well, ProSense Jun 2013 #70
It ain't gonna be fixed. Autumn Jun 2013 #21
Then, they will need to take the heat... kentuck Jun 2013 #23
Excellent point. KNR leveymg Jun 2013 #26
"When is the right time? If not now, when? If not us, who?” suffragette Jun 2013 #27
Well, duh. Skidmore Jun 2013 #28
People are imperfect beings. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #29
Well said, Savannahman. kentuck Jun 2013 #30
^^^THIS^^^ is a perfect example of why DU needs an individual post rec feature. Melinda Jun 2013 #79
Right, in fact I consider it marions ghost Jun 2013 #93
It will be fixed whenever there is enough uproar over it Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #39
Fix it my voting in 2014 and NOT staying home nakocal Jun 2013 #40
That's not what happened. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #43
Congress needs to change the laws Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2013 #54
The President has NO intention of changing this MNBrewer Jun 2013 #67
Progressives don't stay home. Union Scribe Jun 2013 #83
derpa derpa derp frylock Jun 2013 #97
I would be willing to bet that Obama had that discussion with..... Bonhomme Richard Jun 2013 #41
Well, it was created as part of the war effort against the "war on terror"... kentuck Jun 2013 #49
yes Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2013 #56
You have rationalized him as a coward humbled_opinion Jun 2013 #57
It'll never be fixed. THIS IS BIPARTISAN. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #42
precisely. alterfurz Jun 2013 #58
If only we had one. forestpath Jun 2013 #44
+1. We're still waiting tblue Jun 2013 #95
It will become the baseline for future Republican presidents AgingAmerican Jun 2013 #46
The problem with this is, we apparently only "thought" we had a Democrat for a President. faithnomore Jun 2013 #47
+1000 Many here agree with what you said. RC Jun 2013 #72
even under a Democratic president DonCoquixote Jun 2013 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Jun 2013 #52
You will never see "a fix" from our current power structure. roamer65 Jun 2013 #53
Agreed. k&r n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #55
It cannot be fixed until it self destructs. Imagine a boot stomping a human face forever. nt Demo_Chris Jun 2013 #61
Same could have been said at another critical point in our nation's history. Octafish Jun 2013 #63
Get it done.... Fix it.... midnight Jun 2013 #64
President Obama has said H2O Man Jun 2013 #65
Exccellent point, Waterman.. kentuck Jun 2013 #66
+1 Little Star Jun 2013 #71
You sure as hell can't even play "fix it later" by tolerating, accepting, or even supporting it TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #73
Big old K&R. nt awoke_in_2003 Jun 2013 #74
I love the sentiment, but babylonsister Jun 2013 #78
This is true. But it'll probably have to be the next one. nt Union Scribe Jun 2013 #84
Unfortunately, it won't be fixed under this particular Democratic president. BlueCheese Jun 2013 #86
We need a progressive president. nt valerief Jun 2013 #94
true, reusrename Jun 2013 #98
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If we don't fix this unde...»Reply #20