Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

n2doc

(47,953 posts)

35. Because they don't want to send Rush Limbaugh to prison

Reply to Maraya1969 (Original post)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:52 AM

Jun 2013

There, I went there.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If this surveillance program is so in-dept why haven't they broken up the child prostitution [View all] Maraya1969 Jun 2013 OP

If it's warm in the summer why are traffic lights red yellow and green? Just asking bowens43 Jun 2013 #1

Are you trying to say the only reason they institute this is to control the people and that they Maraya1969 Jun 2013 #3

Exactly loyalsister Jun 2013 #16

My guess is:It needs to be programed to look for that. In_The_Wind Jun 2013 #2

'It'? randome Jun 2013 #4

... call it what you will, - - - needs to be programed with a word ( s ) to detect In_The_Wind Jun 2013 #5

The surveillance system Recursion Jun 2013 #11

They could write an algorithm(s) Are_grits_groceries Jun 2013 #27

Several possibilities come to mind Recursion Jun 2013 #29

I thought about #2. Are_grits_groceries Jun 2013 #33

Because our government is involved in the "black money" these "rings" provide SugarShack Jun 2013 #6

Because such rings are of no interest 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 #7

Child prostitution does not affect the 1%. Zorra Jun 2013 #8

I've got to be honest with you, its never effected me either 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 #12

Thanks. nt Zorra Jun 2013 #23

No, you used it correctly. nt historylovr Jun 2013 #26

Effect is a noun. Are_grits_groceries Jun 2013 #24

Random House College Dictionary, Revised Edition (Deluxe), 1975; pp 23 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 #36

Bwahahahah! Oh, it most certainly does, just maybe not the way you mean. WinkyDink Jun 2013 #14

Thanks. I didn't want to go there with that caveat. nt Zorra Jun 2013 #22

My guess is that you are "on the money". It's a simple matter of priorities as they relate to money ladjf Jun 2013 #18

Because they aren't mining the data to get the "terrorists" or the "child abusers". sibelian Jun 2013 #9

They do all the time Recursion Jun 2013 #10

The elite don't give a shit about that. Daniel537 Jun 2013 #13

It might expose ''sources and methods.'' Octafish Jun 2013 #15

they break up child prostitution rings all the damn time. you are never going to completely wipe out boilerbabe Jun 2013 #17

Because they don't care. That sums it up. Dash87 Jun 2013 #19

These programs,so they say, focus on anti-terrism, not law enforcement. leeroysphitz Jun 2013 #20

The reason appeals courts view this surveillance as a 4th amendment exception is that the ultimate stevenleser Jun 2013 #21

Because that's not the point Demo_Chris Jun 2013 #25

Exactly. nt historylovr Jun 2013 #28

Maraya, I want to show you two articles: Poll_Blind Jun 2013 #30

It appears to be for the benefit Newest Reality Jun 2013 #31

Because many of the Republican "Officials" Drale Jun 2013 #32

Why weren't they able to stop the Boston bombers especially since they knew about one of them? sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #34

Because they don't want to send Rush Limbaugh to prison n2doc Jun 2013 #35