Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
31. Lots of people have an agenda.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:14 PM
Jun 2013

Maybe Snowden's agenda is to let the American people in on a secret so that we can decide what is right and not be pushed around by the NSA.

We are supposed to have open trials, habeas corpus, a right to privacy, and checks and balances in our government in addition to other rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.

Open trials need to occur in every case including in military courts.

Habeas corpus needs to be respected. We are not in an insurrection. Every detained person should have the right to habeas corpus. The Fourth Amendment and the right to remain silent should be amended.

And, all cases and controversies implicating the Constitution or our Bill of Rights should be heard in Article III courts.

There is nothing new about my assertions. It's all in the Constitution and there is much more.

Yet none of my issues are being addressed and my "shoulds" are not being carried out. It's all in the Constitution.

Please, please read the Constitution carefully and if you don't understand something, do a Google search. Your life and the lives of your loved ones may depend on whether we can return to constitutional government or not.

For your convenience, here is a link to a searchable, easy-to-read copy of the Constitution.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Josh Marshall on Edward Snowden [View all] ProSense Jun 2013 OP
There is an agenda. When two like personalities meet -Greenwald & Snowden-... randome Jun 2013 #1
What's the agenda between Obama and the Repubs who have his back on this? brentspeak Jun 2013 #4
Check this out: ProSense Jun 2013 #9
I don't know. All I do know -and I'm willing to be convinced otherwise- is what I stated above. randome Jun 2013 #15
Greenwald's agenda has always been the same so it is well known and has earned him sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #21
Lots of people have an agenda. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #31
Why should the fourth and fifth amendments be "amended"? wtf? xtraxritical Jun 2013 #45
Amended to state more clearly that the government may not JDPriestly Jun 2013 #48
Naw, put more LIBs on SCOTUS. xtraxritical Jun 2013 #51
The "Agenda" Charge RobinA Jun 2013 #28
I wonder sometimes whether we have people on DU who work JDPriestly Jun 2013 #30
Danial Elsberg says this is more important than what he, himself, did. I agree. xtraxritical Jun 2013 #46
Bull nineteen50 Jun 2013 #35
Agreed. B Stieg Jun 2013 #41
Greenwald is an ur-fascist? Maedhros Jun 2013 #42
I don't think that he does... B Stieg Jun 2013 #49
Clearly you do not read Greenwald's column Maedhros Jun 2013 #50
I don't think you read Eco correctly. B Stieg Jun 2013 #52
I still don't follow you. Maedhros Jun 2013 #53
Again, I don't think you don't understand ur-fascism or Glen Greenwald. B Stieg Jun 2013 #54
Russell's Teapot Maedhros Jun 2013 #55
Enjoy your heroes! B Stieg Jun 2013 #56
Try this one on for size... Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #2
Yeah an agenda to bring to the light of day, unconstitutional practices boston bean Jun 2013 #3
No, ProSense Jun 2013 #6
Many laws and legislation have been found to be unconstitutional throughout our history, no? boston bean Jun 2013 #8
Until then, ProSense Jun 2013 #14
How do we get to the "until then"? boston bean Jun 2013 #17
Who ProSense Jun 2013 #18
Good luck with the current Supreme Court: I can't see them touching any of this struggle4progress Jun 2013 #25
We're not just talking about the Government, we are talking about Private Corporations who sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #33
Old or current it is nineteen50 Jun 2013 #36
If there were widespread abuses, as Snowden claims (without any specifics) frazzled Jun 2013 #5
Harm? Look at any RWNJ site and find all kinds of harm, from Vince Foster to Breitbart to who knows. freshwest Jun 2013 #20
This is a program to nineteen50 Jun 2013 #38
I see you found the tin-foil sale at Walmart! frazzled Jun 2013 #39
The new world nineteen50 Jun 2013 #40
I would be curious to know AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #7
ProSense senses an agenda Fumesucker Jun 2013 #10
Lol! whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #11
Wow, ProSense Jun 2013 #12
Mee onley lok att piktchurs no rid werdz Fumesucker Jun 2013 #13
Lol! Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #37
ROFL Maven Jun 2013 #19
... Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #27
Hong Kong has ONE OF THE WORST laws against free speech. Bad choice! JaneyVee Jun 2013 #16
But but but...Hong Kong has a strong tradition of free speech. SunSeeker Jun 2013 #43
Snowden says he's "not hiding" but his first choice would be Iceland while Cha Jun 2013 #22
Snowdon's hope to remain in Hong Kong will zeeland Jun 2013 #47
I read this this AM. longship Jun 2013 #23
Josh Marshall tweeted that after seeing Zero Live Thirty he left feeling "proud." Hissyspit Jun 2013 #24
Oh the irony...someone has an agenda! joeybee12 Jun 2013 #26
Strikes me the same way! avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #32
Of course there's an agenda. Anybody with 2 brain cells sees it. DevonRex Jun 2013 #29
We're all Germans now. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #34
I really don't trust him or his motives. nt kelliekat44 Jun 2013 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Josh Marshall on Edward S...»Reply #31