Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
21. Fully agree that we find some mechanism for the customer to have legal claims...
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:16 PM
Jun 2013

... of how their private data is used when housed on external services. And it shouldn't be tweaked by some buried language in a book-long TOS contract that so many of us sign today without looking at it pragmatically, unless we have a day to do so.

I think that is why I would advocate that we need a technical task force that perhaps reports directly to citizens themselves, or at least not "owned" by government entities that are also "owned" by corporate interests now. Such a task force would be tasked with how to practically put together a set of rules with teeth in them, but are such so that they don't get in the way of the online world working effectively and in a safe manner. That's a tough question.

I as an engineer understand that, where I might have access to things I might need to fix data problems, etc., but at the same time I don't want to look at people's private information either and respect people's privacy as a fundamental priority. It's hard to make a good set of general rules that apply to all cases. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't try and hopefully come up with something that works well. The fundamental problem is that we haven't been "trying" hard enough for so long, some of that by design by the PTB that don't want restrictions on their abilities to have access to this information. If that equation can be dealt with, then perhaps we can get some people at least look at working on the right solutions that work for all of us.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NSA memo pushed to 'rethink' 4th Amendment [View all] The Straight Story Jun 2013 OP
The larger conversation that was part of, for the curious Recursion Jun 2013 #1
Interesting excerpt. Thanks. n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #10
A good reference, thanks. FarCenter Jun 2013 #25
"Majority Views NSA Phone Tracking as Acceptable Anti-terror Tactic" cprise Jun 2013 #31
There seems to be a lot of folks on DU who agree with the NSA's rethinking. K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #2
Yes, but it's not clear any of them are really Democrats. ;) reformist2 Jun 2013 #4
Yeah, I think I ran in to one on a thread I tried to start on this topic earlier... cascadiance Jun 2013 #14
Usually? JoeyT Jun 2013 #30
i'm pretty certain that they're democrats.. frylock Jun 2013 #26
Propaganda is ubiquitous in 2013 woo me with science Jun 2013 #5
Rec. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #6
...and a lot of other people taking a winger story at face value. I don't uponit7771 Jun 2013 #9
did you notice that this happened during bush's reign? frylock Jun 2013 #27
Ron Wyden pretty much backs up Greenwald on this. Maedhros Jun 2013 #29
K & R AzDar Jun 2013 #3
Important post. Our Constitution is under assault, along with the 99 percent. woo me with science Jun 2013 #7
uh..sorry...just cant go around rethinking and reintepreting the 4th amendment.. xiamiam Jun 2013 #8
Obama planned to offensively use the Internet but reportedly only against those in foreign countries AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #11
4th amendment needs to be . . . amended geek tragedy Jun 2013 #12
Yes, earlier I was proposing that the movetoamend.org group also embrace updating the 4th amendment cascadiance Jun 2013 #15
We do have to be careful about taking away rights from corporations with so much geek tragedy Jun 2013 #16
The problem is that they claim "ownership" of this data that violates our constitution protections cascadiance Jun 2013 #17
I don't see how we avoid having private ownership of our data when we rely on private sources geek tragedy Jun 2013 #18
Just to clarify "private ownership", who are you referring to as "owners" of our private data?... cascadiance Jun 2013 #19
To a certain extent, there have always been records of the services we use. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #20
Fully agree that we find some mechanism for the customer to have legal claims... cascadiance Jun 2013 #21
Thanks for the thoughtful conversation. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #22
K&R forestpath Jun 2013 #13
Did You Catch THIS ??? WillyT Jun 2013 #23
So incoming W had "a case for new authorities and technology to adapt to the Internet era?" KansDem Jun 2013 #24
This should cause people to 'rethink' who we vote into office. Rex Jun 2013 #28
Let's start with Clapper nradisic Jun 2013 #32
We need to rethink the NSA. marble falls Jun 2013 #33
Or, as GWB might say: that goddamn piece of paper, blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NSA memo pushed to 'rethi...»Reply #21