Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

edhopper

(37,522 posts)

15. No

Reply to Neue Regel (Reply #10)

Sat Feb 11, 2012, 02:32 PM

Feb 2012

you do not understand Global Climate Change. See my post #14.

Your statement does not apply to scientific discovery. See Einstein, Bohr, Watson & Crick, Alvarez et al.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Himalayas and nearby peaks have lost no ice in past 10 years, study shows [View all] Neue Regel Feb 2012 OP

Not again. demosincebirth Feb 2012 #1

Not again - what? RC Feb 2012 #2

I think the poster means the climate models were wrong, again Neue Regel Feb 2012 #5

Oh. Now I get it. renie408 Feb 2012 #8

Thanks bongbong Feb 2012 #3

The headline was copied and pasted from the Guardian. How is it misleading? Neue Regel Feb 2012 #4

????? bongbong Feb 2012 #17

Ok. renie408 Feb 2012 #6

This post will earn you NO popularity points. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #7

It took me a minute to figure out why fiber count was important to this thread. renie408 Feb 2012 #9

meh...I've been unpopular before Neue Regel Feb 2012 #10

And the ice loss everywhere else is because...?? renie408 Feb 2012 #11

No edhopper Feb 2012 #15

"n any large group if one does not parrot established truthisms" obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #16

"parrot established truthisms" trumad Feb 2012 #18

If you were to study the computer models you would understand that places on earth Bandit Feb 2012 #20

Can ice be lost twice? Electric Monk Feb 2012 #12

How does this feed into 'No global warming'? RC Feb 2012 #13

It's actually called edhopper Feb 2012 #14

Dude--- trumad Feb 2012 #19