General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Clapper & Feinstein finally admit that ALL phone records going back 7 years are being collected [View all]Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Shouldn't? Told not to? Trusted not to? Assumed not to?
I'm on a diet and I 'can't' have milk in my coffee, yet I have milk in my coffee. Is it like that kind of can't, the can't where you do anyway?
Explain the actual, physical process. Since you claim to know. Forget 'can't. If a person wanted, could they access that data without a warrant? Police 'can't enter a home without one, but that really means they can't use evidence they get if they do, because you and I know that they do at times walk on in.
If someone accessed the information would others even know? You yourself close with muttered concerns about improper access and misuse, while the rest of your post is a claim that such access and abuse is not possible. So it could not happen, but we take precautions in case it does? Some 'hacker' could access?
Can't, just can't use it without a warrant but some hacker could use it without a warrant.
Cake and eat it too thinking is a side effect of centrism. 'It is both impossible to use without a warrant, and we have to do it this way because someone could use it without a warrant'. Crazy town.