Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Do you agree with John Boehner that Edward Snowden is a traitor? [View all]
WASHINGTON The House speaker, John A. Boehner, offered harsh criticism of the man who leaked classified information on the governments Internet and telephone monitoring programs, and gave his strongest defense of the surveillance efforts on Tuesday.Hes a traitor, Mr. Boehner said in an interview on ABCs Good Morning America on Tuesday. He added: The disclosure of this information puts Americans at risk. It shows our adversaries what our capabilities are. And its a giant violation of the law.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/11/boehner-calls-snowden-a-traitor/
29 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes, I agree with John Boehner. Edward Snowden is a traitor. | |
8 (28%) |
|
No, I disagree with John Boehner. Edward Snowden is not a traitor. | |
21 (72%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think being a traitor requires mens rea. I think Snowden thought he was doing the right thing.
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#2
Looks like so far, more people view him as a hero. Republicans like Clapper, a war profiteer doesn't
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#11
A majority of People once thought the world was flat, absent objective facts otherwise.
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#12
Far more relevant to this story, a majority of people once thought Daniel Ellsberg was a traitor.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#13
The Fact is, FISA has repeatedy been found to be Constitutional. If you like the Constitution
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#15
Lots of laws have been found to be 'constitutional' our history is replete with them. Thankfully
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#22
This is not a law. This is the Constitution. If you are talking about FISA, do you understand the
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#31
Do you understand that the 4th Amendment forbids warrantless invasions of people's lives.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#33
Do you understand that judges interpret what the Constitution means and they do not agree with you
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#35
Show me 'several decisions' that involved a ruling against probable cause (other than the exception
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#41
Sabrina, trying to pretend a completely different situation's legal rulings apply doesn't work.
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#47
I point you again to the 4th Amendment, that is all we need to know. Our representatives take an
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#54
ellsberg faced the music and didn't seek refuge in a totalitarian state, bragging on said
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#20
Ellsberg completely disagrees with you. He sent a message to Snowden thanking him for his courage
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#34
Snowden has stated clearly that he knew the consequences of his actions. What court would he have
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#57
but he is unwilling to face the consequences of his actions, unlike ellsberg
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#59
The only consequences he should face is a public, not secret, investigation into whether or not
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#61
I think Bush and his 'security' Corps, are traitors. I am glad we have courageous people like this
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#8
Well, all war profiteers will view those who expose them as 'traitors'. But to whom?
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#10
Can't vote, because usually in situations like this, the truth is someplace in the middle. nt
Javaman
Jun 2013
#16
Saw Fox 'news" at the gym and they had the opposite view, calling Snowden a hero.
AlinPA
Jun 2013
#23
Appeals to bandwagon (Elsberg) and guilt by association (Stormfront) are two sides of the same coin
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#39
Ellsberg is a respected hero in this country. There was no need to appeal to him. His words have
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#42
Appeals to bandwagon and appeals to authority are logical fallacies for good reasons the same way
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#46
Well of course if that was the case, you might have a point. The fact is that Ellsberg agrees with
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#58
ROFL. This coming from the poster who tells us what the goons at Conservative Cave are posting...
SidDithers
Jun 2013
#40
Aw, you're so lovable when you try to play 'gotcha' and fail. But practice makes perfect and who
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#43
This is the stupidest fucking piece of shit of a poll I've seen in my life! n/t
backscatter712
Jun 2013
#36
It's a simple question. I probably would have included Ari Fleischer and Peter King
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#60
He's a hero who loves America more than any politician that approves of mass surveillance. nt
limpyhobbler
Jun 2013
#50
Boehner is a corporatist, pushing legislation which benefits things in which he has $$$ investments.
Fire Walk With Me
Jun 2013
#51
Traitor? In the same way that Daniel Ellsberg is? Or, Ronald Ridenhour?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#55
just changed my vote to yes to reflect snowden's sharing of info w/chinese
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#62