Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Clapper appears to have perjured himself. [View all]
(not that he cares)Sen. Ron Wyden says Director of National Intelligence James Clapper had a day to prepare his answer to Congress that there was no widespread collection of Americans' phone records.
Clapper, in answer to Wyden's questions in March testimony, denied that any intentional and massive sweep of Americans phone records as part of counterterror surveillance was occurring. It was revealed in the last week that two such programs do exist and were recently renewed.
In a statement to The Associated Press, Wyden said when NSA Director Keith Alexander didn't provide a full answer to questions about the programs, Wyden gave Clapper a day's notice that he would be asked the question at the hearing. Afterwards, he said, he gave Clapper's office another chance to amend his answer, but Clapper declined.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/us-no-plans-end-broad-surveillance-program
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have been getting lots of mileage out of "least untruthful" jokes in the last few days.
Poll_Blind
Jun 2013
#3
But, he probably doesn't have a girlfriend in Hawaii and is friendly with his neighbors.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#4
If you have a democratic republic with a constitution, this grows legs.
kenny blankenship
Jun 2013
#11
Was he under oath? Remember, during BushCo, some folks were allowed to testify to Congress
MADem
Jun 2013
#29
The current NSA phone records search is for April 25-July 19th. You cite a March hearing/testimony
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#17
What exactly do you think he is admitting to there? About a future program that wasnt happening yet?
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#43
The hearing was in March. The surveillance in the Snowden leak was April 25-July 19
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#46
Do you understand the difference between evidence and supposition? Because it's ironic that you
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#50
It is completly different, Pro. Would you care to explain why you think it is the same to
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#41