Do you agree with John Boehner that Edward Snowden is a traitor?

[sabrina 1]

33. Do you understand that the 4th Amendment forbids warrantless invasions of people's lives.

The 4th Amendment also requires that probable cause be established before any warrant is issued. It also requires that the warrant be obtained BEFORE the invasion happens, not after.

The current FISA Bill with the amendment which was added to get Bush off the hook for breaking the original version of it, which wasn't great to begin with, is even worse.

What probable cause was presented to collect the telephone data of millions of Americans? In what court would a prosecutor succeed in getting a blanket warrant to seize the data of millions of people and how was probable cause for each of those people established?

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

That's pretty clear. Probably cause supported by oath. When and how was this probable cause established for that many people?

These are the questions that need to be answered. If they have done nothing wrong, they have nothing to hide and should be able to explain what the probable cause (which means 'there is reason to believe there was some kind of wrong-doing on the part of anyone who is the target of a warrant) was that resulted in a warrant for millions of people. Unless the whole country is guilty or suspected of being guilty of something, this whole FISA mass warrant claim is nonsense.