Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Those who have Serious Problems with Glenn Greenwald..Is it Him or His Reporting? [View all]Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)55. He is neither a Paulite or a libertarian.
Everywhere you see the word "here", he has a link to back it up.
http://ggsidedocs.blogspot.com/2013/01/frequently-told-lies-ftls.html
I don't really care what labels get applied to me. But - beyond the anti-war and pro-civil-liberties writing I do on a daily basis - here are views I've publicly advocated. Decide for yourself if the "libertarian" label applies:
To apply a "right-wing libertarian" label to someone with those views and that activism is patently idiotic. Just ask any actual libertarian whether those views are compatible with being a libertarian. Or just read this October, 2012 post - written on Volokh, a libertarian blog - entitled "Glenn Greenwald, Man of the Left", which claims I harbor "left-wing views on economic policy" and am "a run-of-the-mill left-winger of the sort who can be heard 24/7 on the likes of Pacifica radio" because of my opposition to cuts in Social Security and Medicare.
* opposing all cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (here and here);
* repeatedly calling for the prosecution of Wall Street (here, here and here);
* advocating for robust public financing to eliminate the domination by the rich in political campaigns, writing: "corporate influence over our political process is easily one of the top sicknesses afflicting our political culture" (here and here);
* condemning income and wealth inequality as the by-product of corruption (here and here);
* attacking oligarchs - led by the Koch Brothers - for self-pitying complaints about the government and criticizing policies that favor the rich at the expense of ordinary Americans (here);
* arguing in favor of a public option for health care reform (repeatedly);
* criticizing the appointment of too many Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street officials to positions of power (here, here and here);
* repeatedly condemning the influence of corporate factions in public policy making (here and here);
* praising and defending the Occupy Wall Street movement as early and vocally as anyone (here, here and here)
* using my blog to raise substantial money for the campaigns of Russ Feingold and left-wing/anti-war Democrats Normon Solomon, Franke Wilmer and Cecil Bothwell, and defending Dennis Kucinich from Democratic Party attacks;
* co-founding a new group along with Daniel Ellsberg, Laura Poitras, John Cusack, Xeni Jardin, JP Barlow and others to protect press freedom and independent journalism (see the New York Times report on this here);
* co-founding and working extensively on a PAC to work with labor unions and liberal advocacy groups to recruit progressive primary challengers to conservative Democratic incumbents (see the New York Times report on this here);
To apply a "right-wing libertarian" label to someone with those views and that activism is patently idiotic. Just ask any actual libertarian whether those views are compatible with being a libertarian. Or just read this October, 2012 post - written on Volokh, a libertarian blog - entitled "Glenn Greenwald, Man of the Left", which claims I harbor "left-wing views on economic policy" and am "a run-of-the-mill left-winger of the sort who can be heard 24/7 on the likes of Pacifica radio" because of my opposition to cuts in Social Security and Medicare.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Those who have Serious Problems with Glenn Greenwald..Is it Him or His Reporting? [View all]
KoKo
Jun 2013
OP
Um no. That was a PAC started by Hamsher and Greenwald. The PAC paid them.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#74
Ron Paul is right about some issues. He's also a foul racist enabling nutjob.
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#39
He made no claims about the slides. He reported precisely what they said with no personal viewpoint
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#58
Not a Greenwald fan, but I feel like taking a shower after reading that post
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#9
Eh, when he started promoting Ron Paul that was enough for me to dismiss him
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#13
I stopped reading him when he supported the Iraq war, DU brings him up constantly
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#20
He wasn't writing when he supported the Iraq war. Please read this. I'd really appreciated it.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#51
I had a melt down when that post was allowed to stand and had a melt down in Meta..
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#52
To be fair that is a golden oldie, but that thread changed the way I think of DU.
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#25
General rule is that if it's possible to be an asshole on a given subject,
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#30
He took money for the precise reason he said. To write a paper about drug
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#68
If Greenwald's reporting is inaccurate, then show exactly where & how that is true.
99th_Monkey
Jun 2013
#27
He's a troublemaker who doesn't toe the party line. We need more like him.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#33
I guess partly what others have said - too much opinion, not enough journalism.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2013
#37
I have never like this guy. Long before all this secret stuff came out because he is never happy
southernyankeebelle
Jun 2013
#53
He's abrasive, confrontational, always looks tired from overwork.... I like that.
reformist2
Jun 2013
#72
All he needs to do is write a few columns about how handsome Barack Obama is.
cherokeeprogressive
Jun 2013
#73