Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
55. He is neither a Paulite or a libertarian.
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 08:45 PM
Jun 2013

Everywhere you see the word "here", he has a link to back it up.
http://ggsidedocs.blogspot.com/2013/01/frequently-told-lies-ftls.html


I don't really care what labels get applied to me. But - beyond the anti-war and pro-civil-liberties writing I do on a daily basis - here are views I've publicly advocated. Decide for yourself if the "libertarian" label applies:

* opposing all cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (here and here);

* repeatedly calling for the prosecution of Wall Street (here, here and here);

* advocating for robust public financing to eliminate the domination by the rich in political campaigns, writing: "corporate influence over our political process is easily one of the top sicknesses afflicting our political culture" (here and here);

* condemning income and wealth inequality as the by-product of corruption (here and here);

* attacking oligarchs - led by the Koch Brothers - for self-pitying complaints about the government and criticizing policies that favor the rich at the expense of ordinary Americans (here);

* arguing in favor of a public option for health care reform (repeatedly);

* criticizing the appointment of too many Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street officials to positions of power (here, here and here);

* repeatedly condemning the influence of corporate factions in public policy making (here and here);

* praising and defending the Occupy Wall Street movement as early and vocally as anyone (here, here and here)

* using my blog to raise substantial money for the campaigns of Russ Feingold and left-wing/anti-war Democrats Normon Solomon, Franke Wilmer and Cecil Bothwell, and defending Dennis Kucinich from Democratic Party attacks;

* co-founding a new group along with Daniel Ellsberg, Laura Poitras, John Cusack, Xeni Jardin, JP Barlow and others to protect press freedom and independent journalism (see the New York Times report on this here);

* co-founding and working extensively on a PAC to work with labor unions and liberal advocacy groups to recruit progressive primary challengers to conservative Democratic incumbents (see the New York Times report on this here);


To apply a "right-wing libertarian" label to someone with those views and that activism is patently idiotic. Just ask any actual libertarian whether those views are compatible with being a libertarian. Or just read this October, 2012 post - written on Volokh, a libertarian blog - entitled "Glenn Greenwald, Man of the Left", which claims I harbor "left-wing views on economic policy" and am "a run-of-the-mill left-winger of the sort who can be heard 24/7 on the likes of Pacifica radio" because of my opposition to cuts in Social Security and Medicare.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

it's not about Greenwald Enrique Jun 2013 #1
pppfffffffttttt VanillaRhapsody Jun 2013 #2
You forgot the smiley to go with it.. Fumesucker Jun 2013 #4
No, Greenwald was slobbering over Ron Paul back in 2007 geek tragedy Jun 2013 #12
and no one here cared Enrique Jun 2013 #23
He was a puny blogger back then, no? OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #35
Nobody cared about Glenn Greenwald period back then--very few hits. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #40
I think he was with FireDogLake at that time Whisp Jun 2013 #46
He's never been with Fire Dog Lake. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #49
He was on FDL's payroll. AtomicKitten Jun 2013 #69
Um no. That was a PAC started by Hamsher and Greenwald. The PAC paid them. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #74
Bzzzzz. Wrong answer. AtomicKitten Jun 2013 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jun 2013 #38
Ron Paul is right about some issues. He's also a foul racist enabling nutjob. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jun 2013 #47
Greenwald was outspoken in denouncing geek tragedy Jun 2013 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jun 2013 #70
I quoted directly. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #71
Yes, all the criticisms Kelvin Mace Jun 2013 #77
His reporting is often very sloppy and that is true in this case. pnwmom Jun 2013 #3
This... SidDithers Jun 2013 #14
+1000 baldguy Jun 2013 #15
I've heard this a couple time here and haven't seen what it is about. Whisp Jun 2013 #48
This is one example of his overblown "reporting." pnwmom Jun 2013 #50
thanks for that link and quote. yep, wee bit over the top. Whisp Jun 2013 #54
He made no claims about the slides. He reported precisely what they said with no personal viewpoint Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #58
Here is a classic DU Greenwald bashing thread chock full of insights Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #5
Not a Greenwald fan, but I feel like taking a shower after reading that post geek tragedy Jun 2013 #9
It was hosted happily in GD for nearly a week, why? Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #10
Eh, when he started promoting Ron Paul that was enough for me to dismiss him geek tragedy Jun 2013 #13
I stopped reading him when he supported the Iraq war, DU brings him up constantly Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #20
I linked to a few examples upthread. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #24
That counts as promotion in my book. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #28
Nice thing about quoting Sullivan is that if you change your mind you can geek tragedy Jun 2013 #31
He wasn't writing when he supported the Iraq war. Please read this. I'd really appreciated it. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #51
I had a melt down when that post was allowed to stand and had a melt down in Meta.. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #52
No surprise there. William769 Jun 2013 #22
To be fair that is a golden oldie, but that thread changed the way I think of DU. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #25
General rule is that if it's possible to be an asshole on a given subject, geek tragedy Jun 2013 #30
Be sure to check out the recommends on that thread. QC Jun 2013 #26
Greenwald is an opinion writer, not a reporter. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #6
^ I am of this opinion as well^ Raine1967 Jun 2013 #32
He comes across as wanting to be 'right'. randome Jun 2013 #7
He has integrity noise Jun 2013 #8
He's a Paulite/Libertarian. He hates both the Dems and the Rethugs. n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #16
He is neither... Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #56
Then why did he take money from the Cato Institute for his white paper? And why pnwmom Jun 2013 #63
He took money for the precise reason he said. To write a paper about drug Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #68
Deliberately printing falsehoods ≠ integrity baldguy Jun 2013 #17
+1 Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #57
Secret Blackwater Contractors Surveying all of us and Small Business... KoKo Jun 2013 #11
Look who "progressives" are making common cause with: ucrdem Jun 2013 #18
So he's a Paulite, libertarian, that explains flamingdem Jun 2013 #19
He is neither a Paulite or a libertarian. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #55
He left out his flamingdem Jun 2013 #61
I'll be perfectly honest olddots Jun 2013 #21
If Greenwald's reporting is inaccurate, then show exactly where & how that is true. 99th_Monkey Jun 2013 #27
I know...many of us ask what IS IT ABOUT GREENWALD? Reporting or Hate of Him? KoKo Jun 2013 #36
Yes. blue neen Jun 2013 #29
He's a troublemaker who doesn't toe the party line. We need more like him. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #33
He does the bidding of the Koch Brothers. Ikonoklast Jun 2013 #60
But, does he have a girlfriend in Hawaii? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #62
Boiled down to it's very essence...you. Ikonoklast Jun 2013 #64
Not really. I never voted for a surveillance state. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #67
I'll desnark for a moment. OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #34
What OilemFirchen said, especially the Skidmore Jun 2013 #41
I guess partly what others have said - too much opinion, not enough journalism. nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #37
Greenwald is now more of a Left Anarchist than Right Libertarian FarCenter Jun 2013 #42
It's about not worshipping Obama. DesMoinesDem Jun 2013 #43
I feel the same way about him as I did eissa Jun 2013 #44
I've never had a problem with Glenn Greenwald, Blue_In_AK Jun 2013 #45
I have never like this guy. Long before all this secret stuff came out because he is never happy southernyankeebelle Jun 2013 #53
Both. I consider them inseparable. Chan790 Jun 2013 #59
He speaks truth to power, which makes many uncomfortable -nt- b.durruti Jun 2013 #66
He's abrasive, confrontational, always looks tired from overwork.... I like that. reformist2 Jun 2013 #72
All he needs to do is write a few columns about how handsome Barack Obama is. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #73
It's because he is gay. The Link Jun 2013 #76
I dislike him because of your post. jeff47 Jun 2013 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Those who have Serious Pr...»Reply #55