Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
6. Please,
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:47 PM
Jun 2013

"They've passed laws to justify unconstitutional acts and often criminal government."

...drop the nonsense.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeah but Glenn Greenwald invalidates all that so there neverforget Jun 2013 #1
But but but Phlem Jun 2013 #2
Naive is such a kind way to put it NoOneMan Jun 2013 #3
I think it was a reference to the Sensible Liberals' favorite adjective nxylas Jun 2013 #22
Yeah, pretty much. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #64
Best humor posted yet! WovenGems Jun 2013 #102
Imperialism has been claiming humanitarian motives... JackRiddler Jun 2013 #104
"If Snowden was an Iranian or a Chinese ProSense Jun 2013 #4
Legal? It is to laugh. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #5
Please, ProSense Jun 2013 #6
Uh despite your user id, truedelphi Jun 2013 #12
Where you in favor of these programs when GWB was in office? peacebird Jun 2013 #20
You're not going to get a straight answer on that, I wager. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #53
Either this program will be declared unconstitutional or JDPriestly Jun 2013 #23
I guess we'll have to resort to more low tech means marions ghost Jun 2013 #78
Lol, have you been reading what the Europeans think of our 'legal' spying on them? sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #67
I think it is more willful ignorance than it is true naivete Skittles Jun 2013 #7
+1 n/t area51 Jun 2013 #21
Thank you for posting. I wholeheartedly agree with your well-written post. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #8
DURec leftstreet Jun 2013 #9
Boom. Starry Messenger Jun 2013 #10
Not naive, suicidal. K&R. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #11
Denial and Defiance. "There isn't a problem/There is a problem but it's not so bad." Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #13
Falling for CATO propaganda is also naive. ucrdem Jun 2013 #14
Then let's turn the conversation to "Why doesn't Obama eliminate these Bush programs now" Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #15
Fine, let's talk about that. ucrdem Jun 2013 #16
Could he veto FISA? End the "patriot act"? Unsign his two signings of the NDAA with its section 1021 Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #17
Could you put those questions in an OP? ucrdem Jun 2013 #18
I encourage you to take the post word-for-word and create an OP. I promised myself to stop arguing Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #19
Clearly it's you who's fallen for some talking point. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #31
That this is a "manufactured RW scandal" is discredited by the fact that even Cheney usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #81
Far from Cato propaganda, I think. Th1onein Jun 2013 #106
congratulations-- this is so well-written and persuasive that the swarm cannot answer it carolinayellowdog Jun 2013 #24
naive? more like machiavellian. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #25
Realpolitik is usually very naive. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #32
unless the people doing the rationalizing are actually intelligence operatives HiPointDem Jun 2013 #35
+100 or political operatives. nt Mojorabbit Jun 2013 #40
or both HiPointDem Jun 2013 #41
What are you playing in your head? Skidmore Jun 2013 #93
Kick, Rec and ... if I can find something that fits... I will fucking FRAME it. n/t Smarmie Doofus Jun 2013 #26
Thanks! (Blush!) JackRiddler Jun 2013 #63
k&r Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #27
k&r n/t RainDog Jun 2013 #28
k/r marmar Jun 2013 #29
k&r for a righteous rant. n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #30
When you talk about fighting the secret government, perhaps you could elaborate Progressive dog Jun 2013 #33
Is that all you can see - armed uprising or elections? JackRiddler Jun 2013 #34
Oh where oh where have the tea party gone Progressive dog Jun 2013 #39
What I have seen since the 60s is that Mojorabbit Jun 2013 #42
So what, I would think most of the people in the surveillance apparatus Progressive dog Jun 2013 #51
"The government of the US" JackRiddler Jun 2013 #43
The representatives chosen by the people write the laws that Progressive dog Jun 2013 #48
Same bullshit rationalization you hear when Bush is in power. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #50
Same bullshit that people who can't deal with not being in charge spout Progressive dog Jun 2013 #54
You're not in charge of anything. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #55
Outside which parliamentary system, the USA doesn't have one Progressive dog Jun 2013 #56
Your pedestrian understanding of terms is indicative. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #58
Yours understanding is lacking Progressive dog Jun 2013 #59
Is that your idea of a people power movement? JackRiddler Jun 2013 #75
I was mocking you, you don't even live in the USA Progressive dog Jun 2013 #76
Oh, the wounded nationalist calls me a foreigner. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #79
Where are you from? Progressive dog Jun 2013 #80
Foreign elements! Spies! Infiltrators! Commies! JackRiddler Jun 2013 #82
We both know you are not an American, Progressive dog Jun 2013 #84
Vile little man. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #89
Self description huh Progressive dog Jun 2013 #90
Expose the foreign elements! Traitors! Spies! JackRiddler Jun 2013 #100
Five days to think up a reply, huh, Jack Progressive dog Jun 2013 #101
I don't spend my life stalking you, sir. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #103
I never said you did Progressive dog Jun 2013 #105
Another admission Progressive dog Jun 2013 #99
Only 40% of American voters can name the three branches of government Fumesucker Jun 2013 #98
"broad multi-issue coalitions" marions ghost Jun 2013 #74
If the NSA is good at finding out shit why were we lied into a war with Iraq? L0oniX Jun 2013 #36
One of the most fascinating aspects ProSense Jun 2013 #37
So do you think the history of civil rights stopped at Plessy v. Ferguson? JackRiddler Jun 2013 #44
No, that wasn't my argument, but I think you know that. n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #45
Merely the upshot. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #49
Thank you so very much! TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #68
Way closer to cut and dry than all the excuses and catch phrases want to think TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #69
I missed you JackRiddler. Octafish Jun 2013 #38
Hey... JackRiddler Jun 2013 #46
Have you heard about the latest in online presence tools? Octafish Jun 2013 #57
Exactly. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #77
It's plain as day jsr Jun 2013 #85
Pretty much. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #94
I wish I could pin this to the top of the forum. LWolf Jun 2013 #47
Thanks. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #52
rec! SammyWinstonJack Jun 2013 #60
Thanks! JackRiddler Jun 2013 #62
People are not naive. felix_numinous Jun 2013 #61
bump JackRiddler Jun 2013 #65
They're not just rationalizing it, they're embracing it. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #66
But only as long as a "D" is president. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #70
And both puppets of Wall St, OilCo, AgriCo, MIC, etc. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #86
+++++so many good points marions ghost Jun 2013 #71
Excellent post -- thank you! n/t markpkessinger Jun 2013 #72
Oh, sure. I bet you'd just LET granny smoke that joint, instead of dragging her ass to jail. Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #73
k & r . . . . .n/t annabanana Jun 2013 #83
It's not naive if one *is* an authoritarian in the first place. Rod Walker Jun 2013 #87
Most of them are followers, of course. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #88
Today, I've decided that this is still true. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #91
Oh look, the next day bump. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #92
Did I say #Snowden yet? JackRiddler Jun 2013 #95
98 recs! Thanks DU! JackRiddler Jun 2013 #96
oops JackRiddler Jun 2013 #97
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rationalizing an authorit...»Reply #6