General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: METADATA IS MORE INTRUSIVE! REPEAT: METADATA IS MORE INTRUSIVE! [View all]Are_grits_groceries
(17,139 posts)You take your approach which is based on your idea of what is a better method over people who have used this method for years. That is the height of hubris.
The method I have posted about is counterintuitive. That does not make it wrong. It is simply a different approach that yields useful information.
Your unwillingness to try to understand ANYTHING that does not bolsters your POLITICAL agenda is pathetic and dangerous. This attitude dismisses valid points and important ideas that need debate. You find any and every article no matter how minuscule and use them ad infinitum to try to shut down anybody who disagrees with you. All of you are like a swarm of locusts who try to "eat" every dissenting opinion by a concerted attack with every thread you can muster. You repeat them over and over.
You and those like you do not want ANY questions or criticism to be voiced because you believe it to be a threat to this administration. You equate dissent with a policy to an attempt to destroy someone. That is what the Republicans have done to President Obama for years. You have the unmitigated gall to act like many people on DU with valid questions are in that same category. They are not.
Many people with much more longevity and steadfast support of Democrats than me are being needlessly attacked. You are out to besmirch anybody that gets in your way. You act as if you are in charge of what is correct and what should be discussed.
I sincerely doubt that you will ever change or entertain any idea that is remotely out of line with your views. You will continue your unrelenting assault with your collection of links to your OPs that you repeatedly post over and over as if volume make you right.
You are doing a disservice to yourself, DU, and those you are trying to defend. Whatever valid points you have are lost in a blizzard of unremitting attacks.