Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nate Silver on Snowden: [View all]morningfog
(18,115 posts)69. I think, for some, DU has a filter that automatically makes normal comments hyperbolic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And back then it used to take a week for credit approval, now it is instantaneous.
A Simple Game
Jun 2013
#17
What probable cause was presented to get warrants to monitor the phone activity of millions of
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#49
If your positive opinion of someone is based off the amount of negative articles written about them
Cali_Democrat
Jun 2013
#54
Oh, no. Now we're going to start revering everything this numbers guy says?
Honeycombe8
Jun 2013
#25
I think, for some, DU has a filter that automatically makes normal comments hyperbolic.
morningfog
Jun 2013
#69
They attacked him on his predictions in 2008, however, what I find interesting is the "group think"
still_one
Jun 2013
#26
Nate did not 'teach us' anything, he uses statistical models to predict elections, that's his
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#85
did nate tweet this before or after snowden gave away the farm to the chinese?
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#75