Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:27 PM Jun 2013

Absolutely no snark intended here, but [View all]

How do we monitor the religious fundamentalists who want to destroy our country without the use of electronic Surveillance?
And if a Federal Judge approves the surveillance (Probable Cause) how is that against the law?
Or should one just face the realization that we shouldn’t be concerned about such things as Security at the expense of the 4th...Kind of “Better Dead than Red"

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
easy- we don't. and it isn't. (and a SCOTUS decision in 2013 will rule it legal graham4anything Jun 2013 #1
The war on terror? AgingAmerican Jun 2013 #2
how is that? nt clarice Jun 2013 #3
The "War on terror®" was an excuse to steal money AgingAmerican Jun 2013 #5
I'm not quite sure how to answer your question unless asjr Jun 2013 #4
My feelings as well... busterbrown Jun 2013 #6
what the fuck? do you realize how completely political such monitoring would be? cali Jun 2013 #7
So your telling me the 4th takes precedence over everything.. busterbrown Jun 2013 #8
The Constitution takes precedence over everything, premium Jun 2013 #9
I'm telling you that who gets monitored is political as much as anything else. cali Jun 2013 #10
Kind of obvious its political... busterbrown Jun 2013 #13
lol. do you think I give a shit what you suggest? cali Jun 2013 #14
so how were these people apprehended unless with surveillance? Sheepshank Jun 2013 #16
They're just as likely monitoring you. tblue Jun 2013 #11
first things first. protecting american rights is more important than sometimes stopping bad guys. unblock Jun 2013 #12
LOL. Just go to their Congressional offices and talk to them. RainDog Jun 2013 #15
a warrant BainsBane Jun 2013 #17
Oh, God, I just know this thread is going to be full of snark but... randome Jun 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #19
Yeah, but we also have to admit that nukes are kind of a game changer. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #23
Even the religious fundamentalists have access to the 4th amendment! Hatchling Jun 2013 #20
I'm getting really into the 21st Amendment myself. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Absolutely no snark inten...