Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
1. easy- we don't. and it isn't. (and a SCOTUS decision in 2013 will rule it legal
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:29 PM
Jun 2013

which achieves TWO of the Bush/Paul agenda.

Tarnashing dems now for 2014, and making it legal forever.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

easy- we don't. and it isn't. (and a SCOTUS decision in 2013 will rule it legal graham4anything Jun 2013 #1
The war on terror? AgingAmerican Jun 2013 #2
how is that? nt clarice Jun 2013 #3
The "War on terror®" was an excuse to steal money AgingAmerican Jun 2013 #5
I'm not quite sure how to answer your question unless asjr Jun 2013 #4
My feelings as well... busterbrown Jun 2013 #6
what the fuck? do you realize how completely political such monitoring would be? cali Jun 2013 #7
So your telling me the 4th takes precedence over everything.. busterbrown Jun 2013 #8
The Constitution takes precedence over everything, premium Jun 2013 #9
I'm telling you that who gets monitored is political as much as anything else. cali Jun 2013 #10
Kind of obvious its political... busterbrown Jun 2013 #13
lol. do you think I give a shit what you suggest? cali Jun 2013 #14
so how were these people apprehended unless with surveillance? Sheepshank Jun 2013 #16
They're just as likely monitoring you. tblue Jun 2013 #11
first things first. protecting american rights is more important than sometimes stopping bad guys. unblock Jun 2013 #12
LOL. Just go to their Congressional offices and talk to them. RainDog Jun 2013 #15
a warrant BainsBane Jun 2013 #17
Oh, God, I just know this thread is going to be full of snark but... randome Jun 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #19
Yeah, but we also have to admit that nukes are kind of a game changer. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #23
Even the religious fundamentalists have access to the 4th amendment! Hatchling Jun 2013 #20
I'm getting really into the 21st Amendment myself. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Absolutely no snark inten...»Reply #1