General Discussion

treestar

(82,383 posts)

4. You don't seem to realize how utterly un-objective you've become

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:38 PM

Jun 2013

This is not true simply because you already decided it is not.

There could have been some plots disrupted. That has to be taken into account in balancing the interests.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

80 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

And here it is: NSA chief: Surveillance helped stop "dozens" of threats [View all] cali Jun 2013 OP

How many were FBI plots? Ichingcarpenter Jun 2013 #1

Exactly. Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #11

Here ya go! reusrename Jun 2013 #76

It's like picking up the phone and the person you were gonna call is already on the line. Octafish Jun 2013 #35

Why would you assume it never happened? treestar Jun 2013 #46

in 1 year, 508 terror prosecutions, nearly half involved paid informants Monkie Jun 2013 #52

Apparently not enough for those who need stories to justify the spying on all Americans AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #58

Yeah, and 9/11 was a CIA plot. pnwmom Jun 2013 #69

No, that was allowed by the White House. DCKit Jun 2013 #74

Here's some o' them terra-ists that got arrested! reusrename Jun 2013 #75

You called it Cali! Squinch Jun 2013 #2

Yeah, kind of like the Boston bombing Autumn Jun 2013 #3

You don't seem to realize how utterly un-objective you've become treestar Jun 2013 #4

There would have been plots disrupted without the NSA ...Bush ignored pre 911 info. L0oniX Jun 2013 #10

Maybe but I'm not really willing to assume treestar Jun 2013 #47

You don't seem to realize that those in a position of power or authority tech3149 Jun 2013 #15

ALWAYS? Are you serious? So you trust no one? That sucks. randome Jun 2013 #17

Not those in power. hobbit709 Jun 2013 #22

they don't have to lie to maintain their positions when they've existed so long treestar Jun 2013 #49

These intel officials have been caught lying countless times before LittleBlue Jun 2013 #20

All of them all the time? treestar Jun 2013 #50

If someone will get up and lie to Congress Aerows Jun 2013 #54

Whats a little perjury when billions of dollars in government contracts ... HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #57

You're talking about a blatant violation of the 4th Amendment. Marr Jun 2013 #61

Ballancing the interests? Savannahmann Jun 2013 #23

Common defense is security treestar Jun 2013 #53

Because this sounds so believable: East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #40

I think it is possible though treestar Jun 2013 #55

I don't think it's all useless. East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #73

The point is it's a self-serving claim with no means outside verification JHB Jun 2013 #78

IMPORTANT: I would rather that these alleged plots had not been disrupted, Pale Blue Dot Jun 2013 #42

Objectivity is nonsense. None of us objective cali Jun 2013 #51

How unobjective Cali has become? Le Taz Hot Jun 2013 #71

I know. All those facts seem to be getting in the way of other opinions. SlimJimmy Jun 2013 #77

Sounds like ubiquitous, nebulous, specious, non-specific ya-da, dada, dada indepat Jun 2013 #5

A boast about pride always invokes a wait for the downfall. L0oniX Jun 2013 #6

How does one "involk" something? sibelian Jun 2013 #8

I think that means it is done from inside the car MindPilot Jun 2013 #16

Thar she blows.... sibelian Jun 2013 #7

maybe they are reading your posts cali..you gave them 1 wk..its less than 24 hrs xiamiam Jun 2013 #9

Like Old Faithful! woo me with science Jun 2013 #12

Hmmm. This guy should enlist a certain word salad poster here to write his "answers". Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #13

+111!11! MindPilot Jun 2013 #19

...... cali Jun 2013 #48

! hootinholler Jun 2013 #80

I wonder if he counts catching Gov Eliot Spitzer with his pants down rhett o rick Jun 2013 #14

This was testimony, not an 'announcement' to throw you off the track, cali. randome Jun 2013 #18

Testimony??!!!! bvar22 Jun 2013 #25

No, I'd rather that he had told the truth. MNBrewer Jun 2013 #28

At what point timdog44 Jun 2013 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author timdog44 Jun 2013 #39

My response to that statement. hobbit709 Jun 2013 #21

Easy statement to make when you classify the Occupy Movement as a threat Catherina Jun 2013 #24

Even those we know we nineteen50 Jun 2013 #30

What about Quakers? Why did you leave out Quakers who were considered a threat in the 60's? AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #59

Well, Nixon WAS a Quaker.... ;-) WinkyDink Jun 2013 #64

Not a very good one. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #66

Same reason I left off the Black Muslims lol. I see them as etc if not very active now Catherina Jun 2013 #67

Apparently, a real list would include us all. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #68

No kidding Catherina Jun 2013 #72

TRUST US blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #26

You called it. n/t Skip Intro Jun 2013 #27

LOL !!! - Perfect !!! - K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #29

Bullshit... Swede Atlanta Jun 2013 #31

what did Greenwald say? warrprayer Jun 2013 #32

I will believe this when my senator (Wyden) tells us that he has seen.. grasswire Jun 2013 #33

NSA snooping has foiled multiple terror plots: Feinstein ProSense Jun 2013 #34

It also chilled our exercise of our constitutional rights. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #44

Oh, well in that case... Not Sure Jun 2013 #36

How Many FBI Co-interl Pro!? BillyRibs Jun 2013 #38

You want to stop plots against the US then... Fearless Jun 2013 #41

Where's the profit in that? n/t AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #60

The profit for mankind is inexorable Fearless Jun 2013 #63

And it also chilled all our rights. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #43

Actually it's trillions, but it's all sekret, so we'll never know. DCKit Jun 2013 #45

Uh huh . . . leveymg Jun 2013 #56

Dozens? Why not scores?! Thousands! Brazilians! WinkyDink Jun 2013 #62

Just like surveillance discovered the WMD in Iraq and the 2nd Tonkin Gulf incident. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #65

Here's another *terrorist* threat joint intel is working to stop Catherina Jun 2013 #70

The public is supposed to take his word on that, and our members of Congress aren't permitted Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #79