Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)

5. I don't think discussing gun laws is meaningless

Reply to upaloopa (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 02:31 PM

Jun 2013

Even if it has been discussed before. If we avoided previously discussed hot button topics this board would be dead. I will read up on the Brady law though. For the life of me, I couldn't remember the name :-P

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What's wrong with the current state of gun background checks? [View all] Bradical79 Jun 2013 OP

for one thing, they are optional veganlush Jun 2013 #1

Most dealers at gunshows have FFLs Jenoch Jun 2013 #6

keyword there is "most" veganlush Jun 2013 #12

In some states that may be true. Jenoch Jun 2013 #13

Not here in California. CokeMachine Jun 2013 #9

Maybe you could go to a Brady gun law site and read up upaloopa Jun 2013 #2

I don't think discussing gun laws is meaningless Bradical79 Jun 2013 #5

From my point of view there isn't a word or thought upaloopa Jun 2013 #10

Personally, pipoman Jun 2013 #14

I don't think there are any background check laws that are expiring, the issue is petronius Jun 2013 #3

There has never been another background check requirement pipoman Jun 2013 #4

correct. nt galileoreloaded Jun 2013 #11

What other background check laws were allowed to expire? premium Jun 2013 #7

I don't understand the objection to a gun registry. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2013 #8