Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Potential juror in Zimmerman trial lied in court [View all]Hoyt
(54,770 posts)56. The defense team for bigoted, gun lover Zimmerman would have excluded me from my written responses.
Further questioning would not be necessary.
I don't care what happened after Zimmerman got out of his car -- as far as I am concerned, he was guilty the minute he identified the unarmed, Black teen as "suspicious," and grabbed his gun.
Unfortunately, I suspect that at least one bigoted, gun loving juror will be selected, and may well hang the jury.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nope. Just talking about those like Zimmerman -- bigoted bullies who loves their guns
Hoyt
Jun 2013
#14
That's right. The Zimmerman trial will have six jurors and four alternates.
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#26
Yes, just the kind of answer one might give in order to be certain of being ejected from the jury
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#31
the cool answer remark was specific to Hoyt's response, not to the juror(in case it wasn't clear)
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#32
Hoyt's responses, and yours, would surely exclude both of you from the jury for cause.
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#35
My writing here would most definitely exclude me because I think he is guilty(and I am juror #8)LOL
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#36
Your opinion that he is guilty is not really the issue, graham4anything. There probably will be
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#38
and also the fact that I an not in NJ. In 99.999% of cases, I could be very fair. This one? IDK
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#42
I definitely would be excluded from jury. As far as I am concerned, the moment Zman grabbed his gun
Hoyt
Jun 2013
#40
And I am sure that you would answer voir dire questions honestly and candidly.
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#41
The defense team for bigoted, gun lover Zimmerman would have excluded me from my written responses.
Hoyt
Jun 2013
#56
Every gun owner that prepares/trains/totes to shoot people is "suspicious" in my mind.
Hoyt
Jun 2013
#57
The man was interviewed by the Orlando Sentinel. He said he didn't remember making the Facebook
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#7
If he was attempting to make a mole of himself, he proved himself unworthy of even that low task.
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#13
WTF does Person resembling mean???That sounds racist to me. What is resembling?
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#27
It's ABC News' way of maintaining a veneer of plausible deniability against accusations that they
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#30
btw, this shows that ALL info is already known on most people, so the culling is really not importan
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#33
Culling of people who have already decided the case and unwilling or unable to change their minds
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#37
btw, I have been on juries. And I can in 99.99999% of the time be swayed by evidence and fair.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#44
To be excused from any jury you need only say "I've made up my mind and it cannot be changed."
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#45
It can work on any trial. One can say "I think the defendant is guilty because of how he looks."
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#50
I do think that jurors who say that, should the same day be put onto a different jury.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#51
Would you agree that some individuals, due to their temperament, are incapable of rendering good
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#52
Why do people think they can post some shit on FAcebook and people will not find out about it ?
JI7
Jun 2013
#61
The judge read aloud the name of a Facebook site that he had posted on, and the date of the post.
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#73
Now he's gone public threatening to sue someone for his privacy being breached.
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#75