Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's say a Judge overseeing a high profile case in which a protest group ... [View all]Laelth
(32,017 posts)11. On the government side, we must remember that there are multiple agencies involved.
For example, Main Core is a joint enterprise of several intelligence-gathering agencies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Core
The Main Core database is believed to have originated with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in 1982, following Ronald Reagan's Continuity of Operations plan outlined in the National Security Directive (NSD) 69 / National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 55, entitled "Enduring National Leadership," implemented on September 14, 1982.[1][2]
As of 2008 there were reportedly eight million Americans listed in the database as possible threats, often for trivial reasons, whom the government may choose to track, question, or detain in a time of crisis.[3]
The existence of the database was first reported on in May 2008 by Christopher Ketcham[4] and in July 2008 by Tim Shorrock.[2]
As of 2008 there were reportedly eight million Americans listed in the database as possible threats, often for trivial reasons, whom the government may choose to track, question, or detain in a time of crisis.[3]
The existence of the database was first reported on in May 2008 by Christopher Ketcham[4] and in July 2008 by Tim Shorrock.[2]
-Laelth
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let's say a Judge overseeing a high profile case in which a protest group ... [View all]
Fantastic Anarchist
Jun 2013
OP
On the government side, we must remember that there are multiple agencies involved.
Laelth
Jun 2013
#11
You know, I was joking, but that's not a bad concept to put out there.
Fantastic Anarchist
Jun 2013
#26
That's why we have a 4th Amendment, to protect us from the government ever having this kind of
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#13
if a majority of people agreed with the group, their lawyer would have chosen a jury trial
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#20
yeah, the group should be controversial (popular w/many, not so w/many)
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#37
Let's say a Gov of New York is a major pain in the ass to the Bush Admin. They peek into his
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#22
Not that I am aware of but I wouldnt doubt it. I think it happens a lot that we never find out about
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#47
That's because we cant handle the truth. They are out there guarding the wall. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#53
One of the best dialogs in any movie. And that's what they think of us. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#56
This guy sure looks like someone is holding something HEAVY over HIS head during his "testimony".
bvar22
Jun 2013
#23
Not a rouge member, but a rogue member, though if he dresses in red, that's fine by me.
Fantastic Anarchist
Jun 2013
#41
It's no use. Some here live in very carefully crafted denial bubbles and fight like hell to
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#49
I wonder if they MIB'd John Conyers, who had gathered enough information against Bush
Fire Walk With Me
Jun 2013
#42