Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's say a Judge overseeing a high profile case in which a protest group ... [View all]Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)55. I see what you did there!
"Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinburg? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago, and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to." ~ Colonel Jessup (A Few Good Men)
And this is the way the government thinks of us, I suppose.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let's say a Judge overseeing a high profile case in which a protest group ... [View all]
Fantastic Anarchist
Jun 2013
OP
On the government side, we must remember that there are multiple agencies involved.
Laelth
Jun 2013
#11
You know, I was joking, but that's not a bad concept to put out there.
Fantastic Anarchist
Jun 2013
#26
That's why we have a 4th Amendment, to protect us from the government ever having this kind of
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#13
if a majority of people agreed with the group, their lawyer would have chosen a jury trial
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#20
yeah, the group should be controversial (popular w/many, not so w/many)
arely staircase
Jun 2013
#37
Let's say a Gov of New York is a major pain in the ass to the Bush Admin. They peek into his
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#22
Not that I am aware of but I wouldnt doubt it. I think it happens a lot that we never find out about
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#47
That's because we cant handle the truth. They are out there guarding the wall. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#53
One of the best dialogs in any movie. And that's what they think of us. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#56
This guy sure looks like someone is holding something HEAVY over HIS head during his "testimony".
bvar22
Jun 2013
#23
Not a rouge member, but a rogue member, though if he dresses in red, that's fine by me.
Fantastic Anarchist
Jun 2013
#41
It's no use. Some here live in very carefully crafted denial bubbles and fight like hell to
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#49
I wonder if they MIB'd John Conyers, who had gathered enough information against Bush
Fire Walk With Me
Jun 2013
#42