General Discussion

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)

31. They dont have a suspect yet. They are looking for suspects. nt

Reply to snappyturtle (Reply #29)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:14 PM

Jun 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

xPost from BOG: Transcript of the NSA Surveillance Portion of my 6/9-10/13 show [View all] stevenleser Jun 2013 OP

Thanks for the cross post, Steve. sheshe2 Jun 2013 #1

You're welcome! stevenleser Jun 2013 #2

Thanks for a great show and discussion and the transcript! Will get to it tomorrow. freshwest Jun 2013 #10

Obama actually switched his stance on FISA while he was still a candidate, in July 2008 JaneyVee Jun 2013 #14

I'm still reading.. I keep getting interrupted! Cha Jun 2013 #3

Kick!! And thank you Steven! LeftInTX Jun 2013 #4

K&R. A must read! (nt) Control-Z Jun 2013 #5

Read this Atlantic article. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #6

And the ideal of almost total freedom that we had when the Constitution was written pnwmom Jun 2013 #8

Are you in favor of doing away with the Bill of Rights? JDPriestly Jun 2013 #9

No. I'm in favor of tracking phone numbers and if links to terrorists appear, pnwmom Jun 2013 #11

The government has that ability withoout kettling the rest of us. This willy nilly snappyturtle Jun 2013 #26

No, it doesn't, since the govt. doesn't know BEFOREHAND who might be connected pnwmom Jun 2013 #28

Please, look. All they have to do is get a warrant for the phone records of their suspect. snappyturtle Jun 2013 #29

They dont have a suspect yet. They are looking for suspects. nt stevenleser Jun 2013 #31

Oh, that makes me feel better. snappyturtle Jun 2013 #33

Domestic political activities are not part of the foreign espionage or terror exemption stevenleser Jun 2013 #34

What if I was an OWS sympathizer before country x's involvement? snappyturtle Jun 2013 #35

So let's parse it out stevenleser Jun 2013 #37

I just re-read what you wrote. It hit me in another way: snappyturtle Jun 2013 #36

Nope, I am not saying that. nt stevenleser Jun 2013 #38

My bad. I shouldn't try listening to immigration reform discussion on teevee snappyturtle Jun 2013 #39

Kind of far fetched. reusrename Jun 2013 #44

That is a totally different conversation from what we are seeing from Obama critics but... stevenleser Jun 2013 #12

So basically FISA needs to be modified and modernized ... ananda Jun 2013 #13

I don't think creating straw men is the way to discuss anything. That person did not say that. nt stevenleser Jun 2013 #15

*never mind* Sheepshank Jun 2013 #17

Bookmarking. Thank you, Steven! n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #7

You're welcome! stevenleser Jun 2013 #16

DU Rec...nt SidDithers Jun 2013 #18

The truth of the matter......... Sheepshank Jun 2013 #19

It was actually my first time listening to your show Jamaal510 Jun 2013 #20

Thought you might enjoy this blast from the past on Greenwald.... msanthrope Jun 2013 #21

Wow, so he is trying to accuse others of something he himself did. Interesting. I also stevenleser Jun 2013 #22

Well, not only did, but he truly managed to screw over his client in the process... msanthrope Jun 2013 #23

looks like someone didn't notice that was from over a year ago JI7 Jun 2013 #32

Glenn Greenwald actually wrote about it before but now acts outraged. Go figure. DevonRex Jun 2013 #24

Hong Kong costs. The Mira isn't cheap. nt msanthrope Jun 2013 #25

to read later snagglepuss Jun 2013 #27

Two days later after this post and no criticism. I find that fascinating. You would think that those stevenleser Jun 2013 #30

for one thing, you are wrong about the date of the FISA warrant having to do with the Boston bombing NoMoreWarNow Jun 2013 #40

Three months worth of surveillance renewed every six months or so? stevenleser Jun 2013 #41

Perhaps engaging with you about the facts of the matter is too much to expect. redqueen Jun 2013 #42

I've always felt that Liberalism and Progressivism were first and foremost fact based ideologies stevenleser Jun 2013 #43

Kick nt stevenleser Jun 2013 #45

The legal underpinnings aren't rock solid, and will be subject to challenge Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #46

Smith v. Maryland does not involve a National Security Issue. The rules are completely different. stevenleser Jun 2013 #47

Just FYI, I am reading it now, Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #48