General Discussion

quakerboy

(14,790 posts)

60. I'd watch it

Reply to Fantastic Anarchist (Reply #28)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:13 PM

Jun 2013

If I were a better writer, I'd try to write it.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Let's say a Judge overseeing a high profile case in which a protest group ... [View all] Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 OP

Sure Savannahmann Jun 2013 #1

The metadata is used for a different purpose. reusrename Jun 2013 #58

Thank you! Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #59

They did exactly that to someone...was it the CEO of AT&T? lob1 Jun 2013 #2

It was Qwest hobbit709 Jun 2013 #4

Yes, thank you. lob1 Jun 2013 #7

I read that. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #5

That's what the convicted corporate CEO fraudster claims anyways. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #12

But do you think my hypothetical is possible? Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #17

The hypothetical is certainly possible. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #19

Does Elliot Spitzer ring a bell? nineteen50 Jun 2013 #24

Forgot about that! n/t Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #34

And John Edwards. I read that his affair was discovered from his JDPriestly Jun 2013 #43

Rielle Hunter leaked the stuff on Edwards JI7 Jun 2013 #44

That is not what I read. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #46

"Let's say"? Shoot, just put it all in the affirmative lol. Rec'd n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #3

Point taken. Thanks for the Rec. ;) n/t Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #6

No doubt. The potential for abuse of all this data is immense. Laelth Jun 2013 #8

It is on both the government (NSA) and corporate spheres. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #9

On the government side, we must remember that there are multiple agencies involved. Laelth Jun 2013 #11

And the key is ... Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #14

Quite. Laelth Jun 2013 #16

So, they say, at least. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #18

can Edward Norton play the evil dude in black suit? snooper2 Jun 2013 #10

That would be my first pick. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #15

Thats actually a good idea quakerboy Jun 2013 #25

You know, I was joking, but that's not a bad concept to put out there. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #26

Adding Two Agents Provocateur: Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #28

I'd watch it quakerboy Jun 2013 #60

That's why we have a 4th Amendment, to protect us from the government ever having this kind of sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #13

'party over policy' is an ugly thing... Earth_First Jun 2013 #21

And there are plenty right here on DU doing exactly that - RC Jun 2013 #36

Maybe 16-20 years ago, whether private corporations working JDPriestly Jun 2013 #45

if a majority of people agreed with the group, their lawyer would have chosen a jury trial arely staircase Jun 2013 #20

Let's say it's some military commissions type trial Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #27

in that case the fix would be in without the need for blackmail arely staircase Jun 2013 #31

Let's say the plot backfires somewhat. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #35

yeah, the group should be controversial (popular w/many, not so w/many) arely staircase Jun 2013 #37

Know how to write a script? Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #38

Let's say a Gov of New York is a major pain in the ass to the Bush Admin. They peek into his rhett o rick Jun 2013 #22

Didn't something kind of similar happen to Siegelman? Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #32

Not that I am aware of but I wouldnt doubt it. I think it happens a lot that we never find out about rhett o rick Jun 2013 #47

Yep. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #52

You dont if you just drink the Republican Kool-aid. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #54

Actually, something similar happened to the RNC8 (anarchists) Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #40

I believe it happens a lot. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #48

More than we're allowed to know apparently. n/t Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #51

That's because we cant handle the truth. They are out there guarding the wall. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #53

I see what you did there! Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #55

One of the best dialogs in any movie. And that's what they think of us. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #56

Great movie, great scene. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #57

This guy sure looks like someone is holding something HEAVY over HIS head during his "testimony". bvar22 Jun 2013 #23

Yeah, that guy can't play poker. n/t Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #30

Let's say we have a jury, and an appeals process.. Motown_Johnny Jun 2013 #29

Let's say you look at this post: Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #33

Hypothetical upon hypothetical upon hypothetical Motown_Johnny Jun 2013 #39

Not a rouge member, but a rogue member, though if he dresses in red, that's fine by me. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #41

It's no use. Some here live in very carefully crafted denial bubbles and fight like hell to rhett o rick Jun 2013 #49

It is a pity. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2013 #50

I wonder if they MIB'd John Conyers, who had gathered enough information against Bush Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #42

Kicking ... due to this link: Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #61

they went after members of Congress, Senate and the House, especially on the intelligence committee Catherina Jul 2013 #62

And the Supreme Court, too. nt Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #63