Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
58. Sadly...it's getting pretty obvious that Neither PBO nor Congress
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 08:29 AM
Jun 2013

gives a flying fark over whether we support them or not.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Say hello to the new and improved Al Qaeda PuraVidaDreamin Jun 2013 #1
gotta create terrorists to fight and for corporations to make more money from cali Jun 2013 #4
MLK said warrant46 Jun 2013 #35
in your face kick for all those here supporting arming the rebels cali Jun 2013 #2
wow one_voice Jun 2013 #104
The enemy of my enemy is my friend... kentuck Jun 2013 #3
Um... ForeignandDomestic Jun 2013 #7
you summed that up rather nicely. cali Jun 2013 #8
We did it in Afghanistan sulphurdunn Jun 2013 #34
Awesome analysis warrant46 Jun 2013 #42
^^ This, and then some ^^ Myrina Jun 2013 #77
Shhh.. I'm watching So You Think You Can Dance. . .. .n/t annabanana Jun 2013 #78
Amen! beerandjesus Jun 2013 #85
What Cali said. Excellent summation n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #90
Yep leftstreet Jun 2013 #94
That's... sibelian Jun 2013 #20
Why?? kentuck Jun 2013 #46
... Jesus, dude... sibelian Jun 2013 #49
You have difficulty with facetiousness and sarcasm? kentuck Jun 2013 #53
Ah. sibelian Jun 2013 #59
Dude... that's the utterly wrong-headed thinking that made this mess starting (for us) in the '50s. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #100
I agree with you 100%, behaving rationally and intelligently is soooo over-rated.... penultimate Jun 2013 #101
Not promising, but I hope that Obama's smart enough to know which groups are & aren't Al Qaeda. nt backscatter712 Jun 2013 #5
c'mon. use some sense. there is no way to discern this in the fog of war cali Jun 2013 #6
Like I said, it's not promising. n/t backscatter712 Jun 2013 #24
Or just have them taken from them by the bad ones... penultimate Jun 2013 #102
he didnt in libya, they now have real problems with islamic extremists Monkie Jun 2013 #18
Of course we will, if it's useful to us. Laelth Jun 2013 #9
I think it's more about corporate profits than any enemy cali Jun 2013 #11
In part, certainly. Laelth Jun 2013 #12
Al Qaeda isn't the enemy? They've been trying to attack us since 9/11. Dash87 Jun 2013 #61
Take a look at the essay to which I link in this post. Laelth Jun 2013 #64
My question is; "Why do we need an enemy to function anyway?" RC Jun 2013 #83
We have enemies, whether we like it or not. Laelth Jun 2013 #86
Would we care if we had not been meddling in the Middle East for the last 90 some years? RC Jun 2013 #88
Yes, I think we would care. Laelth Jun 2013 #92
Well said. I don't support any US military action beginning with Korea. mbperrin Jun 2013 #112
A couple of months ago Savannahmann Jun 2013 #10
I don't blame you one slightest little bit. sibelian Jun 2013 #16
I too thought this would happen ----I turn this site off for almost a year warrant46 Jun 2013 #39
I hear you. K&R zeeland Jun 2013 #98
It just boggles my mind Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #13
YAAAAAAAAYYYY!!! sibelian Jun 2013 #14
you just got a strangled chuckle out of me cali Jun 2013 #15
I think I might be going a bit funny. sibelian Jun 2013 #19
that will make up for killing bin Laden Enrique Jun 2013 #17
One could rightly refer to it as America's "apology gift" to al Qaeda. David__77 Jun 2013 #29
It seems a grand folly to anyone who has paid attention to history for the last 500 years. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #21
more like a squalid little folly to me. cali Jun 2013 #23
This is a huge mistake leftynyc Jun 2013 #22
Letting Hezbollah win is better? Recursion Jun 2013 #28
staying out is better. just for once. cali Jun 2013 #32
Right, that's supporting Hezbollah Recursion Jun 2013 #33
what if hezbollah did "win"? what does that entail? what does it look like? cali Jun 2013 #36
It's as murky as the rebels' "winning" is Recursion Jun 2013 #40
Don't bother railsback Jun 2013 #109
George Bush coined "Bad Guys/Good Guys" as our new Foreign Policy... KoKo Jun 2013 #51
So I'm coining "bad guys/bad guys", then (nt) Recursion Jun 2013 #54
If you're not with us you're with the terrorists! Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #71
In all honesty leftynyc Jun 2013 #47
I feel the same way Aerows Jun 2013 #69
Yes, because they're at least somewhat reasonable Dash87 Jun 2013 #60
It probably is, I think.. penultimate Jun 2013 #103
Oh goodness gracious, what could possibly go wrong? progressoid Jun 2013 #25
The arms industry has no political loyalty. LuvNewcastle Jun 2013 #26
They want to make debt, then make the money off of the debt. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #80
And if we don't arm them, we're helping Hezbollah Recursion Jun 2013 #27
Yeah, but... TommyCelt Jun 2013 #41
A different group than we'll create by embargoing them Recursion Jun 2013 #45
Hezbollah... TommyCelt Jun 2013 #70
We are under no obligation to get involved in this mess. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #105
Thank you, and you're right. mbperrin Jun 2013 #113
Will the hawks on either side of the aisle learn... TommyCelt Jun 2013 #30
"just so long as the checks clear" datasuspect Jun 2013 #31
Afghanistan reset get the red out Jun 2013 #37
During the first Gulf War, who was the wag that said if Kuwait's main export was broccoli Rozlee Jun 2013 #84
Lot's of lunatics sulphurdunn Jun 2013 #38
If we don't arm them, we won't have any enemies to fight later. Fuddnik Jun 2013 #43
Given that the MIC and Private Military/ Security Contractors provide KoKo Jun 2013 #57
Stupid is... ReRe Jun 2013 #44
When it comes ctsnowman Jun 2013 #48
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #50
As usual, the real terrorists win - the military industrial mbperrin Jun 2013 #52
And they're the ones collecting our metadata. dgibby Jun 2013 #108
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #117
if President Obama does this ....I am done with him. ElsewheresDaughter Jun 2013 #55
Sadly...it's getting pretty obvious that Neither PBO nor Congress KoKo Jun 2013 #58
It's done. cali Jun 2013 #62
then all Hope is gone ElsewheresDaughter Jun 2013 #67
Obama doesn't deserve the blame for this, imo. Laelth Jun 2013 #66
I agree that the pressure was enormous, but in the end he's responsible for making this decison cali Jun 2013 #68
Just like the "brave and oppressed mujahideen fighters" in Afghanistan. Dash87 Jun 2013 #56
you heaven05 Jun 2013 #63
As was said libdude Jun 2013 #65
So you support a bloodthirsty dictator relayerbob Jun 2013 #72
right. of course I support a bloodthirsty dictator, just like YOU support murderous, cannibal rebels cali Jun 2013 #75
Burying one's head in the sand ... relayerbob Jun 2013 #111
It's called the "cycle-of-terror". We support terrorists so they can fight against their dictator. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #73
+1 woo me with science Jun 2013 #93
Anything to keep the American military-industrial complex moving forward AndyA Jun 2013 #74
We were against them before we were for them ... or, wait ... Myrina Jun 2013 #76
12 years of anti-Al-Qaeda hysteria end with us arming them markiv Jun 2013 #79
they defend tapping our phones and helping al-qaeda in the same week markiv Jun 2013 #81
Looks like we need to send Rumsfeld on another Mission bahrbearian Jun 2013 #82
Send McCain MelungeonWoman Jun 2013 #114
Perhaps the objective is to prolong, so that the maximum number of jihadis kill each other FarCenter Jun 2013 #87
You must have meant "freedom fighters" when you said "Al-Qaeda"... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #89
Well, we armed them in Libya. Old habits die hard, we created and armed them in Afghanistan. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #91
"Bring it on!" "Smoke 'em out!" "Mission Accomplished!" "USA! USA!" Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #95
Just let McCain go over there on his own Rex Jun 2013 #96
Does "Charlie Wilson's War" ring a bell. Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #97
Well, we created OBL and milked that for 20 years or so. But the amorphous bogey-man of Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #99
Most of the opposition to Assad is not al-Queda, but pampango Jun 2013 #106
Of course that's true, but we will inevitably end up arming al-qaeda. cali Jun 2013 #107
This is true, MOST are not Al Qaeda railsback Jun 2013 #110
Question 1: where did they get intel for that map from? idwiyo Jun 2013 #115
The graphic isn't right. David__77 Jun 2013 #116
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yay! We'll be arming Al-...»Reply #58