Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Sickening Snowden Backlash [View all]
The Sickening Snowden Backlash
It's appalling to hear the Washington bureaucrats and their media allies trash Edward Snowden as a traitor, when it's our leaders and the NSA who have betrayed us, writes Kirsten Powers.
Since Edward Snowden came forward to identify himself as the leaker of the National Security Agency spying programs, the D.C. mandarins have been working overtime to discredit the man many view as a hero for revealing crucial information the government had wrongfully kept secret. Apparently, if you think hiding information about spying on Americans is bad, you are misguided. The real problem is that Snowden didnt understand that his role is to sit and be quiet while the best and the brightest keep Americans in the dark about government snooping on private citizens.
By refusing to play this role, Snowden has been called a "traitor" by House Majority Leader John Boehner. Sen. Dianne Feinstein called the leaks "an act of treason." The fury among the protectors of the status quo is so great that you have longtime Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen smearing Snowden as a cross-dressing Little Red Riding Hood. The New York Timess David Brooks lamented that Snowden, who put himself in peril for the greater good, was too individualistic. It seems that he wasnt sufficiently indoctrinated to blindly worship the establishment institutions that have routinely failed us. Brooks argued that for society to function well, there have to be basic levels of trust and cooperation, a respect for institutions and deference to common procedures.
This is backward. Its the institutions that need to demonstrate respect for the public they allegedly serve. If Snowden or any other American is skeptical of institutional power, it is not due to any personal failing on their part. The lack of respect is a direct outgrowth of the bad behavior of the nations institutions, behavior that has undermined Americans trust in them. According to Gallups confidence in institutions poll, trust is at an historic low, with Congress clocking in at a 13 percent approval rating in 2012. Yes, this is the same Congress that has oversight of the government spying programs.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/14/the-sickening-snowden-backlash.html
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That is why he should have remained hidden if he really wanted the NSA to be the story. This will
still_one
Jun 2013
#2
Those are two different issues. Even though I agree philosophically with you, if he faced the
still_one
Jun 2013
#4
No one has said that it does...but there are flaws in the story line that you and others swallowed
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2013
#89
It's true, I think he's a hero. I think that particular question has been determined.
reusrename
Jun 2013
#100
It is sad that his actions were heroic and not just normal everyday behavior.
reusrename
Jun 2013
#111
A person, hero or not, can make this decision on their own. It's called freedom.
reusrename
Jun 2013
#117
No I don't think you are right....How on F'ng earth could you possibly for one second...
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2013
#118
A familiar phenomenon. They "looked the other way." While the whistleblowers didn't.
Smarmie Doofus
Jun 2013
#6
He probably doesn't know either. He probably still has that red hood over his face.
randome
Jun 2013
#11
I am not part of whatever "the BOrG" is and I don't know what "the BOrG" thinks about anything.
pnwmom
Jun 2013
#66
Well, you don't seem to be downloading the relevant and rational so I may as well mock.
randome
Jun 2013
#20
And you believe anything Ari Fleischer tells you? He agrees with you on all of this btw.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#84
especially when it is a bipartisan effort, with Feinstein and Boehner showing their ignorance
carolinayellowdog
Jun 2013
#86
It is trying to make "traitor" synonymous with Enemy of the Rich & Powerful
BrotherIvan
Jun 2013
#91
There has not been anything presented which trust should place trust in Edward Snowden.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#15
Having worked under a Code of Ethics it does not make sense. I understand reasons not to reveal
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#22
Better a FISA court that's reviewed by both Congress and the Executive branches...
randome
Jun 2013
#43
Do you believe it is waste, fraud and abuse by what Snowden has presented? If so, he has
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#27
that politico article was so ugly. most obvious smear piece ever. and some of the ugliest classism..
allin99
Jun 2013
#47
As a trasher, I'm trying to decide which I am, a "D.C. bureaucrat" or a "media ally." Plus,sincerely
UTUSN
Jun 2013
#38
You cannot stand with this authoritarian monstrosity and call yourself progressive.
backscatter712
Jun 2013
#98
Lots of the same people frothing at the mouth over him would be cheering him if
forestpath
Jun 2013
#39
Of no concern. Greenwald just reaffirmed he stands by all his reporting, and more is on the way.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2013
#42
There's an important broader story here about the growing propaganda state.
woo me with science
Jun 2013
#58
I wish there were a forum where we could discuss this without having to swat away the gnats.
reformist2
Jun 2013
#64
No, rather it was the content, the author, and the garbage in the article.
Major Hogwash
Jun 2013
#110
Nope. You attacked it because of the author. It had nothing to do with the content.
DesMoinesDem
Jun 2013
#112
K&R. James Bamford has a much more measured analysis than those slamming Snowden.
Overseas
Jun 2013
#103