General Discussion

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)

22. Well, let's say he turns out to be a Chinese spy, how does that make you feel about

Fri Jun 14, 2013, 03:11 PM

Jun 2013

placing your personal, private date in the hands of those who hired him? How many others with 'agendas' might they have hired?

People can't have it both ways. The FFs were very wise to protect the people from government intrusion into their private lives without 'probable cause' sworn by oath, before even obtaining a warrant. They understood the weaknesses in human nature.

I am blown away by the willingness of some here to hand over their Rights in exchange for promises of 'safety'. We can NEVER be safe, but we can be free.

The defenders of the Surveillance Program better hope that Snowden is actually an American who cares about his country and NOT what they are accusing him of. Because if he is, there will be hell to pay that the Government who wants us to trust them with our rights, could be so incredibly incompetent and cavalier with the information they have gathered on the American people.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Snowden's Resume Actually Is Important! [View all] sabrina 1 Jun 2013 OP

Why does his GED say anything about his views? dkf Jun 2013 #1

Well, he's not the point. Those who used his resume to try to discredit him apparently don't care sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #2

Think of how fast that area is expanding. They have to hire whoever is out there. dkf Jun 2013 #3

Congress has abdicated its duty by handing it all over to Private For Profit 'Security' Corps sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #4

I bet a LOT of people with this expertise are foreign born. dkf Jun 2013 #13

I wouldn't be surprised. Which would prove beyond a doubt that none of this has anything to sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #38

In the past, the FBI went out and checked a security applicant's Downwinder Jun 2013 #5

Well, back then I don't think it was all Privatized as it is now. It's all about money. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #7

To be fair nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #18

True, but under Bush it went out of control. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #25

They still do..they will schedule visits to follow up HipChick Jun 2013 #17

I used to work for a contractor that conducted background checks NightWatcher Jun 2013 #23

Nope atreides1 Jun 2013 #28

On this I think we can all agree. randome Jun 2013 #6

Well, his friend is not entrusted with our 4th Amendment rights or a huge surveillance program on sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #9

But...but...private enterprise is ALWAYS more efficient and less bureaucratic! randome Jun 2013 #14

Speaking of outsourcing: LeftInTX Jun 2013 #30

Or maybe Dell wasn't involved in any spying, that he noticed. But you're right, not much is sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #32

Yup. n/t Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #10

I actually think we may have a mole or 2 higher up in CIA who hired him DevonRex Jun 2013 #8

Well if moles can so easily go unnoticed in our government, why on earth would we trust our sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #11

They've always been there. This one is pretty interesting, though. DevonRex Jun 2013 #24

Well, if the US really doesn't like the slave labor in China, that is easily fixed. Congress sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #26

Hell, they couldn't pass gas if they had to vote first. DevonRex Jun 2013 #27

Well then there is no point in claiming we are any better than the Chinese when it comes to profit sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #29

Does that make any sense? bvar22 Jun 2013 #12

No. I think people realize there are huge problems with outsourcing security flamingdem Jun 2013 #15

Well, let's say he turns out to be a Chinese spy, how does that make you feel about sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #22

Lol, I always laugh when I see that old talking point, 'reality based community'. It was used sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #39

Thank you sabrina 1 for your passion, your MEMORY and your sense of justice. Please keep fighting. chimpymustgo Jun 2013 #41

This guy was an obvious security risk (Ron Paul supporter working for Big Brother, hello?) geek tragedy Jun 2013 #16

I think we can all agree ProSense Jun 2013 #19

The more likely it may be that he is all that his detractors are claiming, the more egregious it is sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #40

This post blows away the authoritarian argument BrotherIvan Jun 2013 #20

This is why our government shouldn't be outsourced the way it's being Cleita Jun 2013 #21

It's way past time to have a thorough review of what has been a far too secret sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #37

There would be no Snowden controvery without *Bush's policies. Yes, that's it in a nutshell. nt Electric Monk Jun 2013 #31

Excellent post: LeftInTX Jun 2013 #33

Not off topic at all. You make very good points. Personally, until I see evidence to the contrary sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #35

Du rec. Nt xchrom Jun 2013 #34

K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #36

Spy agencies, especially codebreakers, have always hired idiot savants of various kinds FarCenter Jun 2013 #42

And then they have access to all this sensitive information. That's one good reason why sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #43