Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

17. Do you

Reply to rug (Reply #15)

Fri Jun 14, 2013, 06:14 PM

Jun 2013

"You did. Regardless of who cites it, or ignores it, or rationalizes it away, law exists and applies. Nemo est supra legis."

...suppose that Yahoo would like have won the court challenge to a foreign target request by citing "sovereignty" and not the "Fourth Amendment," which you agree does not apply to foreign targets?

Yeah, "law exists and applies" where relevant, like speed limits.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Update to Greenwald's latest cites NYT article on Yahoo challenge to PRISM [View all] ProSense Jun 2013 OP

You are like a great big Golden Retriever with a ball Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #1

You are like ProSense Jun 2013 #3

Spot on! Hydra Jun 2013 #6

"Pro has done a superb job the last few posts of accidentally backing up Greenwald and Snowden." ProSense Jun 2013 #10

I'm sure you wouldn't know, since you are doing such a good job Hydra Jun 2013 #12

Don't shoot the messenger! JaneyVee Jun 2013 #30

It is not the action that gets you, it is the cover up. Downwinder Jun 2013 #2

If the seizure is within the U.S., the Fourth Amendment applies. rug Jun 2013 #4

If it's ProSense Jun 2013 #7

Answered. rug Jun 2013 #11

Did Greenwald mention "sovereignty" or did he cite the "Fourth Amendment"? n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #13

You did. rug Jun 2013 #15

Do you ProSense Jun 2013 #17

Give me a blue link to the brief and I'll answer you. rug Jun 2013 #18

Does it have to be "blue"? ProSense Jun 2013 #20

No, but preferably it will not lead to one of your posts. rug Jun 2013 #23

Maybe you can spend the time to find it on your own. ProSense Jun 2013 #28

Oh, I'm sure I could but then I'd miss your posts. rug Jun 2013 #29

So your interest in the issue is about me? n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #31

Isn't it all about you? rug Jun 2013 #32

Apparently, it is to you. n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #33

Great questions from Greenwald. DesMoinesDem Jun 2013 #5

"Pathetic spin attempt from Baghdad Bob." ProSense Jun 2013 #8

I thought that was your name? DesMoinesDem Jun 2013 #16

Clearly, you're a smart one. n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #27

I'm waiting to see if Glenn has the bombshells he promised flamingdem Jun 2013 #9

The "bombshells" are ProSense Jun 2013 #14

that's about it! flamingdem Jun 2013 #22

Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #19

. ProSense Jun 2013 #21

So fast, it's almost like I'm on a list. Occulus Jun 2013 #24

. ProSense Jun 2013 #25

"...then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Occulus Jun 2013 #26

Remember this? pintobean Jun 2013 #34

Very good catch nt Progressive dog Jun 2013 #35

Kick...nt SidDithers Jun 2013 #36